[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a
William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CB721E8040 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.775
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.775 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.036, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 046ADDSPu14x for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm18-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36DA21E803A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm18.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:21:57 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.225] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:21:57 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2012 19:21:57 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 529690.46212.bm@omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 94541 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2012 19:21:57 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1344972117; bh=Ouv6geL2giILJ8h6gjvOO20dEA6GHO/6lsom9OqahQM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KVdND6zb/LYJo3cfAADIEiGsdtwI72ifG4uuIum1n/sdI6ncjwpoiluX1PLPXlXmp2RlG9CfqzBXMNb/Ftr/Y1211Bl76lOQ7VgUEJ9Fe44HDVAMzuEdoVjSMPuf6q++2XvE+cuC0nz9L/2fFhsvnNya4yFPa+h9k/R4DiPQoa4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pn7hZIgdAWRiqD6LyyRIgFGxqcXHQegZlUoHJG0YpLu36Oqtdpw6Ju9/VK9V3/R0el+pnLC+uCIhZ6VvhgF29+Ie0u0HhZsKwkegFGeBLRXAU605MZGZ/qr7Iq8iocYCP4Z3toGNrdCSXPdKh75mXulx2QiKASt2Y+95Cy8hZJQ=;
X-YMail-OSG: lQS4fi0VM1kBSV2vCTV4VkCdb59UJYgUMKFAEwD4Xd1TZNA T0Qw.zUadWqTGZcuhtukIMEivT7_iKSfZE6g7_Jvq00dTvo9dhvgzeLcBpqL LnoUghdG_zCYePbOWqzOYrjWBfhjnUtVawlRmyqX0YOSF19imET4U9ZUWXbS RRZwc5r_W1Ss_xQyzTuPnEJ1URbKm75U5mYQ9auzTfYXhhhXi4acgckUe7IU kd7fSgt4IpVlT2AQbSy_ycAd44FqtKjgWNRuq9i_YVG9vXZ3v4P9dhxvklXN fbjmEZFBYA6HNciUvo.PHVkYom6XHtoGrRC6prFfo6IwZgLMe.ADxHw9bFLZ vLtZ.21iDuJxE4m7Eq4ItpF1LNYWKwiY_ZpIBKcoAhQtQbJ4Pd6YRzKbrI3M yaSK.c5iWPIxaKcn4WY8yN8QgGJ33KIEkZ0OBg0YTUe3Bre3e8Gq.odqXoTD zAplfdw_2rtKiahb9OuQqlC7_HBnDQ6dqxMm2QAI-
Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:21:57 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416
Message-ID: <1344972117.60342.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:21:57 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
To: O Auth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1036955950-2081811301-1344972117=:60342"
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:22:05 -0000
What's the general opinion on 1.0a? Am I stepping in something if I refer to it in another draft? I want to reference an auth scheme that uses signing and now MAC is apparently going back to the drawing board, so I'm thinking about using 1.0a. Thanks, -bill
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Ryan Troll
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0a Hannes Tschofenig