Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

[Anthony Nadalin <[e-mail]>]

I will not be at CIS

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: John Bradley
Sent: 7/15/2012 10:59 AM
To: Phil Hunt
Cc: Anthony Nadalin; [e-mail] WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

Good working with you and Tony is the stuff of dreams:)

We can sync up off list and try to reduce duplication.

Are we all at CIS this week?

John B.
On 2012-07-15, at 11:47 AM, Phil Hunt wrote:

> Sounds like a great idea. I can put together a few slides.
>
> Phil
>
> On 2012-07-15, at 7:59, John Bradley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
>>
>> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
>>
>> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating.
>>
>> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
>>
>> John B.
>>
>> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>>
>>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our use cases and requirements
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; [e-mail] WG
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>>
>>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents.
>>>
>>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>>>
>>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
>>>
>>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>>>
>>>               -- Mike
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>>> To: [e-mail] WG
>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting.
>>>
>>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear
>>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and
>>> * whether you want to present something.
>>>
>>> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>>>
>>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the face-to-face meeting.
>>>
>>> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>>>
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth