Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values

torsten@lodderstedt.net Thu, 03 March 2016 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A08F1A1B73 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 00:49:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u60L9kLYIyC8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 00:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FA21A1B71 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 00:49:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [80.67.16.121] (helo=webmail.df.eu) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1abOx5-0007VA-T9; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:49:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_cbf78e75f2f7e0eae7538215eb4d89cf"
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:49:43 +0100
From: torsten@lodderstedt.net
To: Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>
In-Reply-To: <56D7EB04.8080800@connect2id.com>
References: <BY2PR03MB4424F115D8B6624849934D6F5BD0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAAP42hB5nhF7JOaQ9kdcvd1209XSfJxXGSFtooKLm0hHy4BmnA@mail.gmail.com> <6CE40A87-A264-429E-B4A2-7414E9657783@oracle.com> <CAANoGhKZMqOYCEkP7Sy-MU2h=GFYJGcBT3GNFJPLDjf8X0JPUg@mail.gmail.com> <56D7EB04.8080800@connect2id.com>
Message-ID: <52912e6eb13bcc988fdde0897eb19f29@lodderstedt.net>
X-Sender: torsten@lodderstedt.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/QWAfbWpBZso7JMYoDzLsREEdXcY>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 08:49:50 -0000

 

+1 for adoption as WG document 

Note: AMRs are mainly intended to be used in OIDC context. e.g. the
MODRNA WG refers to this spec. The document should clearly state that. 

Am 03.03.2016 08:43, schrieb Vladimir Dzhuvinov: 

> +1 to have the AMR spec adopted
> 
> On 03/03/16 03:20, John Bradley wrote: 
> 
> +1 for adoption still
> On Mar 2, 2016 10:18 PM, "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 for adoption. Again.
> 
> Phil
> 
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 17:03, William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption of this specification by the working group.
> 
> We are already using some values in production and I see interoperability
> advantages in having these standardized.
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:42 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption of this specification by the working group. Aspects
> of it are already being used in production by Google and Microsoft. It is
> also normatively referenced by the mobile profile for OpenID Connect being
> produced by the OpenID MODRNA working group.
> 
> -- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes
> Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:09 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method
> Reference Values
> 
> In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
> adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html [1], Mike
> submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns into
> account. Several working group participants responded positively to the new
> version.
> 
> We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
> submitted version -05:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05 [2]
> 
> Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working
> group.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth [3]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth [3]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth [3]

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth [3]

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth [3]

 

Links:
------
[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05
[3] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth