[OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 19 January 2016 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA06C1B2CA3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:47:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKumvEMHmgx1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9C21B2C9E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.141] ([82.142.85.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIe0O-1aJItO3yTg-002Eb3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:46:59 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <569E2231.1010107@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:46:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8Kt7Ve6AQv8uF7F9JLBt2AINjJRTQ6jG5"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W3k5gTIYmmr/xnHGgTTDDB8180jE/C+jH/cgmW15cqrmfPnPCrv HB37ArUT5vshAdbmv83jl3WY8DRX6EKMO4glw8OL0TcfA2Yk7Y3fEoZqii8mQJEqLfjRCZ5 JqK5CHPV/8cS6XfGwc7INztBIS9Cm+v0/ps1RMTbNjhazi8Kd9yKHe08qDn7t8GeAP7g4zz mPMPvdxCTUC3SwXA0oHiA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Gxoib5GXkHA=:D3EIDBvG2yYsH1wOGPkRpV akYS0a/cw/C0TBR+rhz+8aXTFQmZhvTMYWqwBPpVLY+WwvVRZb32JQ3+q7p4lAPaeP1iZEzk5 q6qUAMG50Hjq49V+Y0BTnz4Pyxsl+purpenaLd+LHAeFBLPUpdBR4sSe+FKxTqhjojFiM2OBG TMIjBx35MI88/4HmgexnEKc9YtIM0yC1qUkVRzR7TwZfzuNaVO3vO2xdDFejlZSw49xTPsNt2 g5s1zbLGykOz3hE47FGwXy2DdD+u9f/q8oXi05SIG/wU+YKoce/fkHkenMBny4H1OdqjTtn35 h/797SaE1Sy5Gle4EOI0ux8fRs/6uUsAhZS18Ck3f0Z7Nh2bnH8uKSk2JUyv+iYyuRuH5P7IB x+bkV7FkrdKqAkinckVpohCaeWWgHN6mQ6HfI6OfKOUZNlyQxm80yDLlYRkAMxrV4QkuwaQZr FGepRFHuo2y2qUo0CBA+Ix9BGmgstg8KfS5I7WPJO20ycIfyk5q+07NzdK8XUN0XJDkGMocrC 7ryb1DkKKqpcLY376Qe7uzJX4LgFtC64hPOVHPyw/YBIBJmI+w2Fal8bqZCbEgfeohmoDWdR8 TwyIHWim/ysVNlAUKQYNfa0J++SGpU3XQRDLMBss77/4KGTa4h2pySfjifc5wXohMk7uQSpg7 3lLnqE2RRGsxuJwK5Ep4ohGiLph7b20JsAP/cjQYFsL9420vzXAhRPmJa4CfRblXrNELXwoBV o+lI0VgmkklSIZL8sRijkK9kmTRuaL+xyJAwVEOpwvFvPXngRfTPBkZ2m/8=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Qfa41CiRTiMjzDFLpDrseWVNNjY>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:47:04 -0000

Hi all,

this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wdenniss-oauth-native-apps/

Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.

Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama
then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.

The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 16 persons
for doing the work / 0 persons against / 2 persons need more info

Ciao
Hannes & Derek