Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP: Threat Model

Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> Mon, 04 May 2020 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fett@danielfett.de>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE403A1330 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=danielfett.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63NMDtUGACjt for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d3f.me (redstone.d3f.me [5.9.29.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1623A12A2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 12:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by d3f.me (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 302E1198C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 19:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1588618971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IyeM+95AuEt8B+p4D5cPfXjArwjOe1xgy6Nb7VkC3zU=; b=jAIK29N27nkllqDspxfd88PjDNgbIJdzj1nOp6vGe8yUXgU+FiLne5jAUNOG962zaMS0WW ZE/YoZWKdvDiXKtKo8I66/vG0Jwwmf+6Il9Mm9Ufq5bOVt6u1YwOSbUCsxmdUf72uV29xB nLlVJQjpifNRtwhxB1oP9xqXQA8E6XA=
To: oauth@ietf.org
References: <9ee75fc4-c134-1a36-1fa3-4c42887dc438@danielfett.de> <a8022870-caf8-0230-aeca-e2634d54765c@free.fr>
From: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Message-ID: <04440508-a4e7-9cab-288b-2414c72e19ac@danielfett.de>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 21:02:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a8022870-caf8-0230-aeca-e2634d54765c@free.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B83E8DF30727BFDEF28FD628"
Content-Language: de-DE
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1588618971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IyeM+95AuEt8B+p4D5cPfXjArwjOe1xgy6Nb7VkC3zU=; b=IERea38NBp92QcOSPCB8f9ZBIXqmkqxpAezoE+ZTBhHGksc+RDy5FflRH3E2s0lajad19y b2faLmXudP24RKPrCwZ51OjAT2sYS2/13M548dlEcBBMz/kDF+/w8BqjahKkrwqugLAgIE R9Eg2NngEK+PtZnjrOnxeYwunuRvfwM=
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=danielfett.de; t=1588618971; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=X9Y3zZA00ak8ePAxuPUHtI6vg5ME/HbljtKwTudaNDb/u4zvf4aLR/n//ao34UQqfRm0Y+ 0gluEQ7610EuKpQc3h6z1+kyZv5GbpjaY0oepSB4N9TcZxNA2lBbLR1cWXFMjdvyKzTz0w mknjBaMr+G3xTOKD8oq+W9s81HV3akM=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
Authentication-Results: d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/R-tJNS6JmXIps43ZKS4nRxC_F_A>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP: Threat Model
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 19:03:39 -0000

Hi Denis,

We discussed these kinds of collusion attacks at great length previously
on this list. My views on them have not changed.

Am 04.05.20 um 20:06 schrieb Denis:
> As soon as a software solution would be available to perform this
> collaborative attack, everybody would be able to use it.

Teamviewer is sufficient and widely available.

-Daniel


> Denis
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as mentioned in the WG interim meeting, there are several ideas
>> floating around of what DPoP actually does.
>>
>> In an attempt to clarify this, if have unfolded the use cases that I
>> see and written them down in the form of attacks that DPoP defends
>> against:
>> https://danielfett.github.io/notes/oauth/DPoP%20Attacker%20Model.html
>>
>> Can you come up with other attacks? Are the attacks shown relevant?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth