Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 07 July 2015 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D016C1A88A5 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwBmkgI78IcC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0705C1A8898 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgfr2 with SMTP id r2so22162919wgf.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a72PbpGCtLFdGYbzx/fnVrvcd3dHQIkAYwSYFloFgBs=; b=wiAZ42ltrPH8fcZWCOBrNhaw3IUfos+i7h/2I1FEhVlJrCdRu+uANuA6LvHRfWYSmf ujNGHn7wASjZ08X0Kgn4mW6EGhJNX9cF2ABHIaFL1Yy5JfAhtpHAeNhUyyMg0kSiV++7 w3oldyMCzMZIVdRadGSVrV1eZU7YGyn8V6dNc0K+q8QJY6nTeLaLFMVUoTuzUFcScX6w FjOn+5M7zsi4wz4CWBCUtsvBBb30YasSMSlTd8s7sCsRVch0ZXJIPBlMavhLiyVfSHoy vKZF914Xg6vBu+KcjEYPPFnySEOmcVJJrjigZomet3rvHCQ3Hhs75grpM6vOCnS4yd2Q M7ZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.95.67 with SMTP id di3mr65722754wib.78.1436298240637; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.194 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH4hZDtr=0fE96bsJDxEzp-ZctJrrpYP4xgEKvGVRJ8Dsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6B22D19DBF96664DBF49BC7B326402B42739A904@xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com> <BY2PR03MB442205D40E8F1ECD88082F2F5AE0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <55928DB3.7090300@gmail.com> <5593C270.7000008@gmail.com> <5593DA7D.80401@mit.edu> <5593E5FD.3050403@gmail.com> <CA+k3eCTA+HmwnMBUBzD7FKYWL37BMA7az_2BE+vnqqpO3=2utw@mail.gmail.com> <559A676F.3070008@gmail.com> <CA+k3eCTJsLqn88K4qEYJUzoxwAH4boWGsvJZtZi8guvV6C6zSA@mail.gmail.com> <DEAFAD4A-36F8-47D7-813D-35948CDCEA2C@ve7jtb.com> <BY2PR03MB44276C3D04E3FE5AE238298F5930@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+k3eCTRK9ND5c2HbDU=3ctZ3J4u3HMA2QHNZfEpwtfcwiLxfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CY1PR0301MB12437C5CFE06B7837375E5DBA6930@CY1PR0301MB1243.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <2BB85061-F141-478C-96B1-5086AFDA1F4F@oracle.com> <559B176F.90105@mit.edu> <tsly4irlqsp.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHbuEH4hZDtr=0fE96bsJDxEzp-ZctJrrpYP4xgEKvGVRJ8Dsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:44:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5VaeXBizLbV0mkp0uNmnHHnW7qTGYnKBOfa4ZOJK6LoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044287e26cc1dc051a4e3ed0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/R3d2uU_S4QwyFPEXNt4US7GQgoE>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:44:05 -0000

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm just catching up on this tread, but would appreciate an in-room
> discussion on this topic that doesn't assume the adopted draft has the
> agreed upon approach as I am not reading that there is consensus on that
> approach in this thread at all.
>
> Could we see presentations on Mike's draft and Brian's?  Justin, do you
> agree that Brian's draft covers the use case in our draft as was implied in
> this thread?
>
s/our/your/ :-)

>
> I'd like to see a discussion guided by the chairs to see if we can find a
> go-forward plan.  There seems to be differing opinions and maybe a pull
> towards simpler approaches that extend Oauth.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> Speaking as someone who is reasonably familiar with Kerberos and the
>> general concepts involved, I find both Microsoft/Kerberos technology
>> ((constrained delegation/protocol transition) and the ws-trust text
>> horribly confusing and would recommend against all of the above as
>> examples of clarity.
>> After several years I've finally gotten to a point where I understand
>> the Kerberos terms, but that's simply by using them regularly, not
>> because there was clarity.
>>
>>
>> This may be a case where new terminology is worthwhile if you can find
>> something that multiple people (especially new readers not overly
>> familiar with the concepts) find to be clear.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen