Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures
Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Sat, 26 June 2010 21:16 UTC
Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC913A688C for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZkA51vvc4p8 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0D33A6885 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p4fff0ef0.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.255.14.240] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1OSckB-0000t2-BK; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 23:16:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4C266E45.70603@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 23:16:53 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
References: <AANLkTingCgO-o3XRZbxYoD8U2rRTO-EgWcfg2hBlbQHm@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingCgO-o3XRZbxYoD8U2rRTO-EgWcfg2hBlbQHm@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090503060000050204060900"
X-Df-Sender: 141509
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:16:49 -0000
would your proposal allow to issue and use HMAC Verification Keys in the same way as the "old" token secrets, i.e. an AS would issue such keys along with tokens to the OAuth client? A special key id could be used to indicate this scenario. regards, Torsten. Am 21.06.2010 09:04, schrieb Dirk Balfanz: > Hi guys, > > I think I owe the list a proposal for signatures. > > I wrote something down that liberally borrows ideas from Magic > Signatures > <http://salmon-protocol.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/draft-panzer-magicsig-00.html>, > SWT <http://groups.google.com/group/WRAP-WG/files>, and (even the name > from) JSON Web Tokens > <https://groups.google.com/group/WRAP-WG/browse_thread/thread/a99369c4b74d4cd0#>. > > > Here is a short document (called "JSON Tokens") that just explains how > to sign something and verify the signature: > http://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1kv6Oz_HRnWa0DaJx_SQ5Qlk_yqs_7zNAm75-FmKwNo4 > > Here is an extension of JSON Tokens that can be used for signed OAuth > tokens: > http://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1JUn3Twd9nXwFDgi-fTKl-unDG_ndyowTZW8OWX9HOUU > > Here is a different extension of JSON Tokens that can be used for > 2-legged flows. The idea is that this could be used as a drop-in > replacement for SAML assertions in the OAuth2 assertion flow: > http://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1s4kjRS9P0frG0ulhgP3He01ONlxeTwkFQV_pCoOowzc > > I also have started to write some code > <http://code.google.com/p/jsontoken/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/main/java/net/oauth/signatures> > to implement this as a proof-of-concept. > > Thoughts? Comments? > > Dirk. > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Justin Smith
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures John Panzer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Ben Laurie
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Breno
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Breno
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Paul Tarjan
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dirk Balfanz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal for signatures Nat Sakimura