IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change grant_type="none" to something less confusing

Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com> Fri, 16 July 2010 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <beaton@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441D23A6924 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdmZW84TMPss for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4683A67F4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.80]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o6GMRaoW012905 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:36 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1279319256; bh=QjwpI25GB7b1dmNb4Xjo03k+IgM=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=uZC1eb0LvAvstWOpdbtmZPawr9vM+a52vlS9CBP3HZLBZvvAA15PRrW+MZljiBxUi hqHXB9j+AqE7GNJhmzSLQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=BbcpqVbmg3IMuPtkStJK5gZHRRXhwIbjAtbNU7OqvdddUptNTAaT7PXeQ/gFK2nqO wyIVE5n74eU4YpIZBBw9Q==
Received: from pxi12 (pxi12.prod.google.com [10.243.27.12]) by kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o6GMRYbX025205 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:35 -0700
Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so1819965pxi.20 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.134.13 with SMTP id h13mr2368853wfd.119.1279319254518; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.193.19 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3AF1FD6F-2178-42ED-833C-D93C534DDA8A@hueniverse.com>
References: <1279297826.11628.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> <AANLkTinRE0My8GRTVrBM9cwyCWgrpeYQzul3YBp_Z-8A@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim_GpxKx2G6FQN9TGwMYxnRv4N7pOo7Yo3g2s6c@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinDwGDYq4IYA9BKJakdEMnR8FbruTqR4i_zS88p@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinbbIJ03UPFWibPJC569ckseU33Tnyf-1BYRGj2@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimfdpugQSgTMUPtLy-xOMIB-dJ4E8IMzB5EwU6R@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTintmqhY1PY51h4DcXEI0r3FQmIB92pP3vykPQrw@mail.gmail.com> <3AF1FD6F-2178-42ED-833C-D93C534DDA8A@hueniverse.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:34 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTindn2UOcqWz410_UnyAORe58_XpXQKcy5sMt_pF@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change grant_type="none" to something less confusing
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:27:25 -0000

I withdraw my question.  David might not be interested in implementing
the client password flow, but he is certainly interested in
implementing other flows that involve the client password term.  So
he's entitled to an opinion on what color the client password bike
shed should be painted. =)

(David, no offense, I'm just trying to stick by my guns on the whole
"stop screwing up the spec by merging separate use cases into single
flows" thing...)

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> And that matters how?
>
> EHL
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 16:57, "Brian Eaton" <beaton@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM, David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've always found "client password" to be a confusing term.
>>
>> Are you going to support this flow at all...?
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status