IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] Web Finger vs. Simple Web Discovery (SWD)

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> Thu, 19 April 2012 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F8521F86EB for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.237
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.237 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0cO1Kg89HnLJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B8D5221F86D1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 16:41:06 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.224] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 16:41:06 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1033.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 16:41:06 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 130269.74419.bm@omp1033.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 57186 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Apr 2012 16:41:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1334853665; bh=CaE44Le6VvGX7T+MpltDrsLIESJiSlHgWlFat5CkBYw=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=G2PMZJSCiwZBlGb5xWDnr6KiMxmSLAw5w/5ynOGkt+ia1UB8pnKyn9mlYn29U/BcAfP2oF6/3BJT1RsYFparm8S++1undSun0jvELuaGDtXm5dFuk/6+gLj9CzZc3p4w0Ot/3qN7HlSgdlBBaskIIwFjBetXLJuh5FmpO34ziB8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k0fWdUN5GjrjZCPNoBCHPBCEdf9JdQchYTH7nBSiL6EWmKiFEDop4SNmD3gs6GFlLjJBqQdGeTRM3yGNIbrueA60ck7pdXeZbLtK/1esTK7TkL2Yr0QoMpZFn+cgOCIWadzkYYjINEyEVZSertKKOiuNXdg4fxDklD0hrCOa+IQ=;
X-YMail-OSG: HByvUqIVM1nbChYj.f_4wSABmYXGK7aOJIWFnsCUieJ.bf9 1HEaz3TVN80GW1dMNdXfYYl7WO.4fz3AJ1wEwrErhWBnJel_IQRj_VFksQ6Z EqMEV_RlXLPND_yQNKEgz8q.2yRy8SLA8_HnxxeRQZuxnoJmpgKfgwbFu5sm fl1IYaV2vCU5ShqgKglnBAT7kAdC8jl2z28HFzui7ZD1_n0jfhpst0WOnSl7 S_og6J5rGL3US5Y8hkDnND6KKNyx3PYNZyjLoynpZCgcl3yrOcIjDC1LmXAK yJirnl.Kctt96cYOtAFyHqnGlgSZ1w4p.TKkLEUdmlfaCbTu4L7Ml5UNp_pA TNq5MS2_.uERaaI6_Pi6HBiOPha44BZ5vFea2PDYXzQQqY18HwNHN.obtLLP Y4RYnk2kUSXQR8efVyT_uijkHdF0wBDz9WJy01o6iERXOTmEgTww-
Received: from [209.131.62.115] by web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:41:05 PDT
X-RocketYMMF: william_john_mills
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524
References: <423611CD-8496-4F89-8994-3F837582EB21@gmx.net> <4F8852D0.4020404@cs.tcd.ie> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280EFE8D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <sjm1unn338j.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FACC3@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Message-ID: <1334853665.6573.YahooMailNeo@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:41:05 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>, "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FACC3@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1458549034-2129002210-1334853665=:6573"
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] Web Finger vs. Simple Web Discovery (SWD)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:41:12 -0000

I would characterize it as two distinct camps, folks that think WF can be updated to do what SWD (growing contingent I think) does and folks that are invested in SWD.  I haven't seen any movement between those two camps, specifically that the SWD folks think WF can in fact solve their problem if updated.

-bill




>________________________________
> From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com>
>To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>; Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org> 
>Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] Web Finger vs. Simple Web Discovery (SWD)
> 
>By all means people should correct me if they think I'm wrong about this, but so far from monitoring the discussion there seems to be general support for focusing on WebFinger and developing it to meet the needs of those who have deployed SWD, versus the opposite.
>
>Does anyone want to argue the opposite?
>
>-MSK, appsawg co-chair
>
>_______________________________________________
>OAuth mailing list
>OAuth@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email