IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Fri, 13 August 2010 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17E3A67E2 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.833
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.833 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5nuq8+87Yjv for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 173843A63D3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([74.125.82.46]) by na3sys009aob103.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTGWj9Pk2Fd9b6a2u5Bs9LX3dpNK9qzwY@postini.com; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:45 PDT
Received: by mail-ww0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 15so192420wwe.27 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.154.211 with SMTP id p19mr1954495wbw.19.1281729524156; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.60.136 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3F1D6A06@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3F124503@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <C8897C4C.B75E%cmortimore@salesforce.com> <AANLkTinbmx+CBJdMrf5vBuV7wqLwWDLP3vA1N2HcUMHL@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3F1D6A06@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:58:14 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTim1F55uX033eT4UBmqyg4SCH192JqidnmGKSqcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:58:09 -0000

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> The only change I'm aligned with is being more specific about repeating parameters
> and potentially allowing the assertion parameter to repeat. That's it for the core spec.

Thanks for clarifying that Eran.  That's the only change I was
suggesting here.  And if others think it's too complicated, I'm not
married to it.  Just seemed like a potentially useful thing.

> The SAML spec should be more specific about allowing or not multiple assertions for the given type URI.

Yes, and it will be.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status