Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21.txt
Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Fri, 01 May 2020 09:37 UTC
Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD673A0D80 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lodderstedt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRYd4IK0vRzm for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51833A0D6E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id t8so3569651uap.3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lodderstedt.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HaWojZ154ty1BuXuO0+YO3eSKuA4lL2H6ORoaKrmkaI=; b=5awIM4iy4PfIWH8iLvP2aZ1BguuIoFxQNnU9m4l48MLuUcP9lQbPr644tU5GXS8Il7 kDxPQWCHUPbildXKpAgsOuC5kQAqu3ZJPt6thfGsRSVBKeQqMUbutWiQzvagCIUOZ0HE Fd/t/Q+2Jy+PsIuy5mpLk+z5HpTEbm1kuB9vXAVm0y2y27K2obCIkW4DJicDwVwqH2CG A0iUHZ3YZ7y8fNd0RSzWkV92BHN1ykO4Nefu8rcvZwI+3EFJIRi0pZrsdrcbX+aM1iTC xf8iF4Ly81EF52YDH+fbKwIJIIgChDNX/QK+0sTUG0fH9g0K5cruf7LwrXoGDSrCg0zU LSRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HaWojZ154ty1BuXuO0+YO3eSKuA4lL2H6ORoaKrmkaI=; b=YTbplIPX9t9T4J+OFWjD0EHSCeJ223P0UJhezNAPXhEMT7NTAH1OYB5xy/2/bqDtqo gU5qnU6fpQ2N0TJ+y6Byj78OZN9RDRsMJrhVwxmsEjNWazZ6ucl0/cZM9kL9KhycPhs3 oONDJ4RxooHVa4ulLugyAu0odEVogN/RpuJYRz+rDhgD1a0olegvaypyvawEoajf01UN vTzcmRfxgwGSDUTzjsGtBqbziVx6RwavF671UeBtwlzfXR2fQd0M3WkGtiGQJ0OgOlwu R8MYXYfJA4hb0SG/B0y7P23jutPZqDd5keQgdrMTY5LbENpZlT3luJdPDiZLNVaViExc jHGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZrnTdMrpOgnuKpgn448MTPBG80j32DlnHzpC4TCi2zmJlja3Rt hgm4Iky4jwfCKHhHVSneWZHFp0bO3D31t50WcH0WqA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIhIT/d5FvU1K0QjMbRnVGxylzeW3doPcc0hM4c3MdSwvAgLYCKVbV2AHXQcPi3pw4+MojrSofdufrNfPlNcBA=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4ac9:: with SMTP id t9mr2241797uae.40.1588325825619; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR00MB06798A6DCC36BD152F324155F5AE0@CH2PR00MB0679.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <88d7c433-bd4b-456a-bc04-d30ed988fe9f@Spark> <BY5PR00MB0676CBF29BE43390EBB459C4F5AC0@BY5PR00MB0676.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR00MB0676CBF29BE43390EBB459C4F5AC0@BY5PR00MB0676.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 11:36:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHOkhHFZQ=f1GLiZr0e-gOC4PMUT33Wz7-BaynYw3kRWfeB3OQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: John Bradley <jbradley@yubico.com>, Nat Sakimura <nat@sakimura.org>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009fc14705a492ece0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/SQABsd61pIo8L-n39nsM-xzH4Hk>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 09:37:12 -0000
Thanks Mike. I suggest to add text to JAR describing use of this registry values to determine the request object signing and encryption algorithms. Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> schrieb am Mi. 29. Apr. 2020 um 01:38: > “request_object_signing_alg_values_supported” and other AS Metadata values > defined by OpenID Connect Discovery are now registered at > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml#authorization-server-metadata > . > > > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* nat=sakimura.org@mg.sakimura.org <nat=sakimura.org@mg.sakimura.org> > *On Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura > *Sent:* Sunday, April 26, 2020 10:29 AM > *To:* Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten=40lodderstedt.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; > John Bradley <jbradley@yubico.com>; Mike Jones < > Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21.txt > > > > Thanks Mike. > > > > Right in as much as I never expected JAR to take this long, I was > expecting the errata to be published and these params to be registered long > before as well :-) But it may be a good sign that we Identiterati are all > so busy these days. > > > > Nat Sakimura > > Chairman, OpenID Foundation > > https://nat.sakimura.org > > 2020年4月27日 2:17 +0900、Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> のメール: > > The next errata version of OpenID Connect Discovery will register the > parameter request_object_signing_alg_values_supported and other parameters > not previously registered. See > https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0-29.html for the > latest published errata draft. > > I can make a request for early registration if it would be useful. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: OAuth <oauth-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Torsten Lodderstedt > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 8:17 AM > To: Nat Sakimura <nat@sakimura.org>; John Bradley <jbradley@yubico.com> > Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21.txt > > Hi Nat & John, > > I tried to find out how signing & encryption algorithms are determined in > the JAR context. > > I just found this note in the history for -07: "Stopped talking about > request_object_signing_alg” > > I assume you assume this is done via client registration parameters > registered in > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml#client-metadata? > Why doesn’t JAR state so? > > What is about algorithms supported by the AS? The respective parameters, > such as request_object_signing_alg_values_supported are not registered yet > in > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml#authorization-server-metadata > . > > best regards, > Torsten. > > > > On 19. Apr 2020, at 20:30, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. > > Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization > Request (JAR) > Authors : Nat Sakimura > John Bradley > Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21.txt > Pages : 31 > Date : 2020-04-19 > > Abstract: > The authorization request in OAuth 2.0 described in RFC 6749 utilizes > query parameter serialization, which means that Authorization Request > parameters are encoded in the URI of the request and sent through > user agents such as web browsers. While it is easy to implement, it > means that (a) the communication through the user agents are not > integrity protected and thus the parameters can be tainted, and (b) > the source of the communication is not authenticated. Because of > these weaknesses, several attacks to the protocol have now been put > forward. > > This document introduces the ability to send request parameters in a > JSON Web Token (JWT) instead, which allows the request to be signed > with JSON Web Signature (JWS) and encrypted with JSON Web Encryption > (JWE) so that the integrity, source authentication and > confidentiality property of the Authorization Request is attained. > The request can be sent by value or by reference. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-21… internet-drafts
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Vladimir Dzhuvinov
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-i… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-i… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsre… Torsten Lodderstedt