Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 0E94D3A6897 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.035
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.851,
 BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PJ37C7LImAoG for
 <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net
 (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with SMTP id E5CF23A6855 for <oauth@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14210 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 05:07:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.21) by
 p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 05:07:52 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by
 P3PW5EX1HT003.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.21]) with mapi;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:07:53 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:08:02 -0700
Thread-Topic: Underscore, dash, green, blue
Thread-Index: AcsY2m8s3S6JcqdzQw6k4C5eNNk6vA==
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7P3PW5EX1MB01E_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
 <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
 <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:07:50 -0000

--_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7P3PW5EX1MB01E_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

First, sorry about this. :)

I do my best not to ask the group this kind of questions and just pick some=
thing on my own, but I can't decide so I'll run a quick vote (yes, a VOTE -=
 I can't imagine seeking a consensus call on this).

-09 uses underscores for parameter names (except for in the headers) and da=
shes for parameter values. This seems like an odd selection. Before, it use=
d dashes for header parameter names, and underscore everywhere else. Not gr=
eat either.

So...

The changes my OCD can live with:

1. Use dashes throughout
2. Use underscores for all parameter names (headers included), dashes for a=
ll values
3. Use underscores throughout

I want to get this done with in a day because people are writing code for -=
09 and I'd like to stop making changes beyond editorial.  I just think that=
 having different styles between the endpoint parameters and header paramet=
ers is broken.

EHL

--_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7P3PW5EX1MB01E_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=
=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micros=
oft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
	{mso-style-priority:34;
	margin-top:0in;
	margin-right:0in;
	margin-bottom:0in;
	margin-left:.5in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vli=
nk=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>First, sorry abo=
ut this. <span style=3D'font-family:Wingdings'>J</span><o:p></o:p></p><p cl=
ass=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>I do my best not =
to ask the group this kind of questions and just pick something on my own, =
but I can&#8217;t decide so I&#8217;ll run a quick vote (yes, a VOTE &#8211=
; I can&#8217;t imagine seeking a consensus call on this).<o:p></o:p></p><p=
 class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>-09 uses under=
scores for parameter names (except for in the headers) and dashes for param=
eter values. This seems like an odd selection. Before, it used dashes for h=
eader parameter names, and underscore everywhere else. Not great either.<o:=
p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>=
So&#8230;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=
=3DMsoNormal>The changes my OCD can live with:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMso=
Normal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>1. Use dashes throughout<o=
:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>2. Use underscores for all parameter name=
s (headers included), dashes for all values<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNor=
mal>3. Use underscores throughout<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&=
nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>I want to get this done with in a day b=
ecause people are writing code for -09 and I&#8217;d like to stop making ch=
anges beyond editorial. &nbsp;I just think that having different styles bet=
ween the endpoint parameters and header parameters is broken.<o:p></o:p></p=
><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>EHL<o:p></o=
:p></p></div></body></html>=

--_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7P3PW5EX1MB01E_--
