IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -12 feedback deadline

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 16 February 2011 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546F73A6E25 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:43:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcHpa+GSkP9u for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D9753A69A6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11093 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 18:43:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.20) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 18:43:28 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:43:15 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:43:08 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -12 feedback deadline
Thread-Index: AcvN+6TPBONTKjOoRXSZjocTCZzjlQADXRAQ
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A91D3F44@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A8D6254D@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTinMjQW26mLkoN7oMdLWLGAHp0_O9LbVi13RpMJB@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A91D3EE9@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTimjWkO8o+z+P=AKpyYkSjTh6oS7uM9N0JwR_vR6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjWkO8o+z+P=AKpyYkSjTh6oS7uM9N0JwR_vR6@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -12 feedback deadline
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:43:00 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurtescu@google.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:05 AM

> Yes, I understand. But Native Apps have no appropriate flow now, and they
> started the whole protocol.

I am not sure "they started the whole protocol" (it was more like OpenID in Twitter API), but either way, why can't they use the implicit grant type? That's where the specification is guiding them towards.

EHL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email