Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-11

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BC4129735; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQGvKadaARvb; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1650B129563; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3173F2CEB1; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:55:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RM4-0O1cINg1; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:55:48 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF842CCBA; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:55:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D4DDE6F9-30B0-4A43-B8EB-E8B1E3CFDC3A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <148607662042.13885.2832003093930390561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:55:47 +0200
Message-Id: <EA4025AC-695C-475F-950C-2AA8DEA294F8@piuha.net>
References: <148607662042.13885.2832003093930390561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/T_qsSt_12yPV8jpL3tEZY6OY2vs>
Cc: Gen art <gen-art@ietf.org>, oauth@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-11
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:55:52 -0000

Many thanks for your review, Joel.

I have balloted no-objection for this document on today’s IESG telechat.

Jari

On 03 Feb 2017, at 01:03, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>; wrote:

> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Not Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>;.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-??
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2017-02-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
>    Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described
> as
> "non-normative"?  Is it incomplete?  incorrect?  An example is, by
> definition, not a full specification.  The language seems designed to
> reduce the value of the example.  I would recommend removing all the
> "non-normative" notes from the examples.  They are clearly stated to
> be examples.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art