IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-13: (with DISCUSS)

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCD7131DC1; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPW39fd4v91h; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FC9131DB8; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p73so10833234qka.2; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hG7VVGUSRsxon265JgVcUD9XXc1DLlGg4IogeqNHnOs=; b=Lgqnt1e7CU8KIP5c4RaGk5z0k1luobQc4zOUSljb2dmDXAqAmt9Pxojo2SWE5JcuPt W+VXbffoXNHTAeemb4xoeCBoFYaWn4Y0n8Ablhz27iix5NtwjBRFNqXbPu2Fsh8zx4/A HUWhk2qIwmoklMKWib87o8nJMbj2GD7iKPKe6b4U5JIz/ezAWmD2p4ml2UXABCqYG1o/ DdO3Ss3DT1g3Uul2lYNxOCp/dt6IJGwBQvUKxDAlQkEfkXisIXisxEEGkNwQN0BsdO/n u+q7Ic1j4cIQDSLSKeOMqbpsHr0Ikt4TSYU3lap1Yop7SOVe+VB6ymGdExWtLb0WaS6G K75w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hG7VVGUSRsxon265JgVcUD9XXc1DLlGg4IogeqNHnOs=; b=YuJ10QeVMf21Y4I3eoP1PI/lOJ9Sas2LnyzmXmoz6psfjbB74rDAJDWixnYMU4IQ83 ASUh/gADmkSAcVCH4cOxs/sA/eHleO95qBxiBTDP51com8vVkPg5FZ5yLMsPz7+9T2Z6 v1PHO9/tSYzuxq8MbVJWWIp03paD/AOw/R7k413gHbfpwJd0u9JpLMZbjlcF0qvgLEDl tZLL/vwmxdnGOocn2JQJyPMHN8/ZbCzkC1GWqsAct7oyhxumCW2k7JscMmcioKSJE1UM F5heAKeOsh2oD+HCMKcxHOoIHqpPf+ISFfoy3gXivJmc7N+KtMFIH7KtLYj7YGdw5OJs SrjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111kAJ67VOOkvlv7/7yMIALfRHAb37JU9SiVk2Rj+AvT7QWNSUkf pEdZt2bpCsmHHbHHJrMqyrGJEIJdhw==
X-Received: by 10.55.212.3 with SMTP id l3mr659877qki.144.1500367829837; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.57.230 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAANoGhL+93i=Y7jyhL=Eg8tgFwjePPdYMJNhNXzUnXNWejS27w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149302898487.25852.14603447850318285300.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAANoGhL+93i=Y7jyhL=Eg8tgFwjePPdYMJNhNXzUnXNWejS27w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:50:29 +0900
Message-ID: <CABzCy2BGM_KuJBtacRVi=a+nn1SNTnKF1BoRvisuBRba43qdMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147a2dc87ac3f0554939bd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/TcT6P0UJzidlhEb8hf_NaoyepXI>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-13: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:50:36 -0000

Sorry to have taken so long to fix.
In my private repo, I have added Content-type: application/jwt in the
example.
See http://bit.ly/oauth-jar.


On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:11 PM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:

> Thanks.  We will try to address that today.
>
> John B.
>
> On Apr 24, 2017 7:16 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
>> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-13: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS about use of RFC 6125.
>>
>> I have one  new small issue from your recent change in In 5.2.3 (that was
>> addressing my comment to include a response example): the example doesn't
>> include Content-Type and (possibly) Transfer-Encoding header fields.
>> Without these it doesn't look syntactically correct.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email