Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests
Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Fri, 10 January 2020 14:48 UTC
Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C55212016E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:48:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1yeQyOkIjREd for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEC51200F7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00AEmX5R014436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:48:33 -0500
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <AF9F2E7C-4536-4776-82E9-1F82ECE7008C@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_372B2DDE-711B-41BC-846B-24A1D64672B3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:48:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAGL6epJs6snM35Ua5GaY6CB_XubQkLWpbeLaiY4+MhSedMgXWw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAGL6epJs6snM35Ua5GaY6CB_XubQkLWpbeLaiY4+MhSedMgXWw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/U5ndJCOcSlXARfPTaAIp8t7wZH8>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:48:39 -0000
+1 With the comment that there’s going to be a lot of coordination between this and other components already in OAuth 2 (scope, resource, aud/audience, JAR stuff) and anything that might come out of TxAuth. Those are two of my main goals as co-author of this work. — Justin > On Jan 6, 2020, at 2:37 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests document. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-rar/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-rar/> > > Please, let us know if you support or object to the adoption of this document as a working group document by Jan 20th. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Daniel Fett
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Vladimir Dzhuvinov
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Rob Otto
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Jim Willeke
- [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich Auth… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Filip Skokan
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Richard Backman, Annabelle
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Steinar Noem
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Joseph Heenan
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Dave Tonge
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Matthew De Haast
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Rich … Torsten Lodderstedt