[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Device Flow

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 19 January 2016 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822BC1B2CAA for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMNHlVXBaWwp for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38891B2CA9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.141] ([82.142.85.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbuCq-1Zu6W00nWW-00jFZk for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:28 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <569E228B.1010309@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TfDKn94XP8sBOm2Gdj1EmcWCeAariqm9O"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uueXb2Kh1f9GKqVt2Uqitc7h0Svm2gJd0dmDAM7ldC1Ckqy1ixM H4GKtMYZhEZWwYpBZLLEdMwGi8ykEbbH9/3DXW44lnQkzjAbzME4age82C9tm/SV+IbAgw/ gAujYvxaw/T2V2wLTQjkK2Gbn6hKtSnH8+Yqc6zjcXC4CfPgtdCC1Hdg0K387E/D5kovS6f LxdNU3F7Owv3okdlx9aCw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LXUDU/wCtHE=:3v1MPF+v8+YMxGWKXZb38s veqQ1U5fwV/mx4p2px1TCOoTmhvgiqdX1KAMdnvyRtOPvA9zGUYx+E1FBUpfnc360RVs3qNzX BTJUJpOMCCtvDwvciYKO6+FV83A8xkcgKt6AHX2jQa+P70iMnZgqb/j9+YEkbC3BzE2UVuB16 mY7h5VyMVY5NSr+TXVtGzXafAUlBYp2ZHVnPsbFkNTnCgGafr0V4szsCM1cfP5DT3UkGmmd08 LN6PRuc2FfWX2JCYUjl6V0om71H6J7GeHgfjmL2G77mu25yY6OKSMMosGhvWGb2IcaYd54drk 4zicdgqo+7/2o9OM3h7QuazQbRSCDIzU7+5bzodABgjHoGRyZJtXeaw242MvoBFzJuD/5M2tk 7dACAG4zVhB0xMdfhqHv6HuFY8nCbFGac2ddGsISVh781Bpx/IlTk6kj8qq2zTsssjZOh0QFi VWJHpiymDZli2EQ1OeHUqfdBYVAcbWoN5gOlCB6NjTQKK9ZRs1ifDGJ1ofHmSMqhHbNJGIqv3 9ZvLuyS/qT46yTnJ9Sb4ZYZukDd7DI52C1bXhArcEogZPuuXBdlDQ4guTnXnXKTLp258PqNlo rTOZlbcHZtiSORcAYLHHa3tiAHm5D9T3lMAJkYuJDTHujmoGnyIo7jpfzzxNrzcZlZJc+Vrz8 jFcoFuRelW256JvZ3h3xPDgVNfTF8UKIOVw+ZjitDqqUm9zOXNaooxZdpAT3x+pHSRkZ6gDJq OfWs0xUvBZpE3oZXhNyHyaFQzU/iTLz2rnk/94lr3k/dxQ7qy+mqE8+//KA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/U7FsPASLxhNz4eB2FNypw4n952c>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Device Flow
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:48:31 -0000

Hi all,

this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Device Flow, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-denniss-oauth-device-flow-00

Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.

Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama
then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.

The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 16 persons
for doing the work / 0 persons against / 2 persons need more info

Ciao
Hannes & Derek