IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation

Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C72921F8A04 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:21:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qk9q4d9meFH7 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (na01-bl2-obe.ptr.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D6221F8566 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2FFO11FD003.protection.gbl (10.1.15.202) by BY2FFO11HUB023.protection.gbl (10.1.14.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.609.9; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:52 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.609.9 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:51 +0000
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.81) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:20 +0000
Received: from mail54-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.241) by VA3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.7.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:19 +0000
Received: from mail54-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail54-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2E94A0245 for <oauth@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -20
X-BigFish: PS-20(zzbb2dI98dI9371Ic89bh1432I1418Ic857hzz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL17326ah8275bh8275dh18c673hz31h2a8h668h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail54-va3: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB036; H:BLUPR03MB035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en;
Received: from mail54-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail54-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1360164011630956_3765; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.235]) by mail54-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9134D8069A; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by VA3EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (10.7.99.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:09 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB036.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.209.148) by BL2PRD0310HT003.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.263.1; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:08 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.209.147) by BLUPR03MB036.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.209.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.614.5; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:07 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.43]) by BLUPR03MB035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.43]) with mapi id 15.00.0614.003; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:20:01 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation
Thread-Index: AQHOBH1uQnGxeW7vfEueX6bNKilo1g==
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:20:01 +0000
Message-ID: <c78f5209366f4a73b11dcdf37aa36900@BLUPR03MB035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [96.8.44.21]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c78f5209366f4a73b11dcdf37aa36900BLUPR03MB035namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BLUPR03MB036.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MITRE.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%GMX.NET$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(199002)(47446002)(63696002)(53806001)(20776003)(77982001)(56776001)(56816002)(54356001)(74662001)(33646001)(59766001)(16676001)(44976002)(49866001)(79102001)(31966008)(76482001)(50986001)(74502001)(47736001)(4396001)(51856001)(6806001)(512874001)(47976001)(54316002)(5343635001)(46102001)(65816001)(42262001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB023; H:TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0749DC2CE6
Cc: IETF oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:21:03 -0000

I think that there are still fundamental design disagreements that would need to be resolved.

Sent from Windows Mail

From: Justin Richer
Sent: ‎February‎ ‎6‎, ‎2013 ‎6‎:‎57‎ ‎AM
To: Hannes Tschofenig
CC: IETF oauth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation

As editor of introspection draft, I would like to see it become a
working group item. After talking with the chairs, there appears to be
some friction with the amount of open working items that the working
group has right now, though, leading to hesitation to add more to our
official plate.

That said, it doesn't mean we can't all just *work* on it, and I'm
actively editing it based on feedback. We're implementing and deploying
it in our own systems right now, too. I'm tracking issues to the draft
here if you have any direct changes (or pull requests!):

   https://github.com/jricher/oauth-spec/issues

So I hope that we can at least stabilize the functionality of the spec
so that by the time the IETF process can start to chew on it in an
official fashion, it will be mostly baked and we can run it through
relatively quickly.

  -- Justin

On 02/06/2013 09:45 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> two answers:
>
> 1) Token Revocation:
>
> I had initiated a Working Group Last Call for the token revocation document end of November:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10102.html
>
> As you have seen on the list, this has generated a fair amount of discussion.
>
> I hope that Torsten, the draft editor, is able to produce a new draft version quickly with a resolution of the open issues that is acceptable to the rest of the group.
>
> Then, we will have to judge whether the document can move forward to the IESG.
>
> 2) Introspection
>
> That document is not even a working group item.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Todd W Lainhart wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any intuition as to how far away we are on last call for introspection and revocation?
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email