IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 08 May 2012 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33B711E8083 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNVbOLrK6QeK for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D618611E807F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 May 2012 14:55:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO dhcp50-94-118-50.hil-dcaaedt.dca.wayport.net) [65.89.200.2] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 08 May 2012 16:55:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/o1wErNwbom7qxnhY18+9d01vzOiucorUk3EZBiF gdcndorvwRlXyz
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <5876011F-2C2C-4889-9452-E8BDC1438713@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 17:55:50 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D43D9A24-8499-4D91-8A64-2BF256A4AB34@gmx.net>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E4CA@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <5876011F-2C2C-4889-9452-E8BDC1438713@cisco.com>
To: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:02:33 -0000

Gonzalo: it is great that you, as a co-author, support your own document but I don't think it is particular helpful. 

On May 4, 2012, at 10:49 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote:

> I support this doc being adopted as starting point for WG discussion.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> On May 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> wrote:
> 
>> The above-named draft has been offered as the recommended path forward in terms of converging on a single document to advance through appsawg.  The conversation I saw this week in that regard has seemed mostly positive.
>>  
>> Please review it, or at least the diff, and indicate your support or objection on apps-discuss@ietf.org to adopting this one as the common path forward. We would like to make a decision about which one to begin advancing in the next week or two.
>>  
>> Have a good weekend!
>>  
>> -MSK, APPSAWG co-chair
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email