IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comment (Resource Owner Impersonation)

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F418D21F8B48 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xc7trtxtwU3h for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F94D21F8B34 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27079 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2011 16:59:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.46) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 18 Aug 2011 16:59:32 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT004.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.134]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:59:28 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com" <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:58:11 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comment (Resource Owner Impersonation)
Thread-Index: AcxdvnqUBHFtJju5TJmvCzWaBRU/wQACRMQw
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345029DFAA3E@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <b7df18688b7612cb85418ed587b80044@lodderstedt-online.de> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345029DFA960@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <63366D5A116E514AA4A9872D3C533539570852FDC0@QEO40072.de.t-online.corp> <4E4D3488.6090903@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E4D3488.6090903@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comment (Resource Owner Impersonation)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:58:38 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Igor Faynberg
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:49 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comment (Resource Owner
> Impersonation)
> 
> >This text has been proposed by 2 WG members (Niv and me), and reviewed
> by 3 others (Phil, Tony,>Barry) and all agree with it.
> 
> Maybe my e-mail was lost, but I was and still am among those who have
> agreed with the text, as I am sure many others have

Fantastic! Now explain it to me.

> What is also important is that no one has objected.
> 
> I see neither the reason nor the right of an editor to remove the text.

Nothing was *removed* - it wasn't even rejected. It is simply held back to allow additional discussion and it is clearly within the role of editor.

EHL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email