[OAUTH-WG] RAR's equivalent of insufficient_scope

Dmitry Telegin <dmitryt@backbase.com> Fri, 17 January 2025 05:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dmitryt@backbase.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61ADC1D4A9E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:22:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=backbase.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w3OG1wXfz8We for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1954CC1D4A95 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38632b8ae71so1304802f8f.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:22:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=backbase.com; s=google; t=1737091326; x=1737696126; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XHYvj09QPF9H8J0c86kFL02tnKzlOItOImmXERUFFEw=; b=Jkmf8DqLMzGlS1JzrhjxRaNft2Ijkrc1HZFZDqhCvKipXMBWAy3ZxWm18ItQPmBVim rvgZ0MU6nMvgZ3X/EqPIQwY6F/i2AVio1+vb4w+Pzu01cyvBdayL9YHii/tQAA1wsVZR Y4U6VDJQj/cV3VYTWZMgAwSxRr0Q13j4lRrW5OJrBOYRpFGS1/ndJIfBsjZpGnfTYWXc +0RmybwgkNM6pjXflvxUG80QQRL+q/QbyXX+2t1FRF0SMSScmLTtNExi9bxVJ+E98Hnh ENU50IDOCfeCy0305zzoIIOfxGObwjkY/bzVwqSrmYSIPiF50UwNeAvyFXAflHynLk5g Ujvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737091326; x=1737696126; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XHYvj09QPF9H8J0c86kFL02tnKzlOItOImmXERUFFEw=; b=LkGw9RQRzY1bZthkBsZRLIusCZk/VbFbH7AuamkM/TwtSVNeUIaqr30b4yyiEN3RvT IEKQV/Qgb7yzBAJpqc0QyaDc7m306IhfMj0+yaNYX0jJJ5hCykidzhe0zy6F0xRUuDeU LJabYGdWtNQVRm3TKXUusVbFh/mFU3/UNRtIQwPYwFBJEhxInoaPhjzMCWqgPzSvJFM+ 94s0ioJdFhgWL0LzqrtyO/YxnNgRQbgSFfFOPM6YFDSsyIKynUCd5kzyKZKZwulOlevX SwnhTHbx25mLWP4T/evPZSKGXn6B3bFmo8s43ajgpsiiHmsxD39+4OmUYWaBPE6dW5hB eX7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzXtNQImTCFROCVEqSosmt8zckslMvXC60yXbyZ9WQGz/uir0aU dUveMrAzQoQ9Ue6FC/gIHiA3xLT9wZFrw2+KkWFOVi2T1w1qtp8L/xOM+Q0GjMfOtI8V+YEfmlt dJHaFhJuA8BdH6fn/xmcLyITpm+VB8+t1y/sd5QkwC5+LVuBsdw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncup9eXgf0r0QZ2pXASXwrfLkHTOTfXAyI+OFGFn80gNQ7var7+3ChRzn5ElV/2 bsDStpUpWf59gMaV9BbIQKTJzy//lWFEzvfOARQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHNLbN+Nn/uxY1RHcEZPhbjgkf9MLsGEHD049ePROLZ06vhXKCWs1ddrkm5lN0APeVjdMBKPRoHWFJQAE2uxDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64e9:0:b0:38a:88bc:bae4 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38bf5784ab8mr844316f8f.18.1737091326143; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:22:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dmitry Telegin <dmitryt@backbase.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 05:21:55 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvaQyZh70ZJ95ZgL3veXLV4YFx4wlolLCsskdRXZgZk8lVIB2z8E775tDPA
Message-ID: <CAOtx8DmtKmk1kuvFMDTDfif_qKWu+buC1-ZtmH-dHjhPuHwkmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000700661062be017a9"
Message-ID-Hash: OQQKXGD5DM5OB76MR34ILEPGVEDM6K2Q
X-Message-ID-Hash: OQQKXGD5DM5OB76MR34ILEPGVEDM6K2Q
X-MailFrom: dmitryt@backbase.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-oauth.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] RAR's equivalent of insufficient_scope
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/V8zWnsWxCAbkAEtpSE5nJoOleTQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:oauth-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:oauth-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:oauth-leave@ietf.org>

RAR does not define it's equivalent of RFC 6750's "insufficient_scope"
error response (could be "insufficient_authorization", for example). Is
this intentional? If not, would it make sense to define it in a separate
document?

Dmitry