IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Direct Grant missing in draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1

Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> Thu, 09 April 2020 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fett@danielfett.de>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6033A0D6D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=danielfett.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tN2X6nBVZfL for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d3f.me (redstone.d3f.me [5.9.29.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8402E3A0D6A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by d3f.me (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A08E376A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 07:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1586417138; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HvO524faZUUVYOAW4xWnvg8AYfPY5WbL5E5DwRvJyXY=; b=e2zOYePZKuW3rHIhvFoYIagsMdrCP+d4+laFz0Fk0N0EmpT4N/UZXpCliGqbrfuqutnSNN rn1xn/CL6DZoS/7Cq6y/Ln+B5dM505DHiEOrwbBRODXLQBLDTpotZmBB6FofFSoqJqZUmK YYXRiHJpTp1Fomx7K0tMmJys7wFf+Tg=
To: oauth@ietf.org
References: <CAOW4vyPN7iCt9FdGDhzFWsPB=PVcRaLqgTHtAFA07D-E6SuzzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Message-ID: <07ef79c7-9ae7-98ee-d3d2-b4e7fa68644c@danielfett.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 09:25:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOW4vyPN7iCt9FdGDhzFWsPB=PVcRaLqgTHtAFA07D-E6SuzzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------98E9CAD9F043AB08948F20C1"
Content-Language: de-DE
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1586417138; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HvO524faZUUVYOAW4xWnvg8AYfPY5WbL5E5DwRvJyXY=; b=cui0Ae14gpipuO92rKd720nnaMPR25RCBzZ8fJs8BbbDeVAHGvR4e07dB1ns2Q/0Gt9Cu5 1vlrCBHZprXdGXnGl0chBkL1RvhWD5wPEzQbQCin4MKUehHK8SIv6h+mf1vQOWc18y26Kd ZDSDZypb1ZtdZ9p61tVDEM4wjPvBQX8=
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=danielfett.de; t=1586417138; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=or2y39Sm1AHh0udk3YH3yJSVfLsxyBOOQPaBYtRyCPWjT7CertoyBIW0WW9vr9IhbAcCF4 02AUkDroEk3cCQWNKDv5TkFoFAnckBpBGnNmb0hXfCMMjKkFFXJt8zaO4N0hj/EeWZHne2 HA0zHdZNeihJC/TCrJrUvfopWL3Ed5k=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
Authentication-Results: d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/VJ8_D_l53Pn47TDkHpNcfRJo4cs>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Direct Grant missing in draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 07:25:41 -0000

Hi Francis,

Am 08.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Francis Pouatcha:
> As a replacement of RFC 6749 I am missing a "Direct Grant" with the
> same simplicity as the "Resource Owner Password Credentials" grant of
> RFC 6749.
>
> The reason is that browser redirects are too complex and most of the
> time badly implemented by small teams. For the sake of having SMEs use
> oAuth 2.1 with their limited development capacities, I suggest keeping
> the simple "Resource Owner Password Credentials" with an OTP replacing
> the permanent password.

How does the Client get the OTP in that case?

-Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email