[OAUTH-WG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-05: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the hard work put into this easy to read document.

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 1 --
"has uncovered a need, in some circumstances" (and similar sentences in section
1), it is rather vague for a standard track document... Please add some facts
and data, this could be a companion document about requirements/use cases.

-- Section 2 --
It is rather a question of mine, why does the resource need to be a URI (which
usually bears some visible semantics) rather than an opaque string known only
by the resource owner/server ? This is similar to Mirja's comment about privacy.