IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 02 November 2011 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C9A11E8157 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAdHdWv0LlbG for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6624F11E80BC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C13153D3A; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:45:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1320266730; bh=W1m2azP8EiD9wD FdIv3cs1QMY+51OysVqZSDvxDG0KM=; b=koW8DeGkK4yVbnsIXZeaMX6RjR9kxe 1HmtSOW0zKV1rQ9nBnNV7LtnKQGrefVwaeg8Qqf2KFbrKTIlL24rZTakBiIoBwA5 xoxOX9eAUbvF4SEprLV8yjTgTJUSBUNJOict+dBlhQ50QbGw8tl1PkCSNaFr393K daH6kM42+1RpeUhYHzn1OZe2Mia6hFjbI8EI+ueSIuQBnfVQPNb391JzMyR8uJlt 88w7U1KyWyoxmZyzxBwMIPwA2e/mDsWg/2wl8m4S1/b2c0sl1X3W0FL/b1E9jsTA 5U0ZaTgPk44/VuCxW7pohHTri15ogA+oaO+UELej6+ulejzlBiAbpZzw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id brEyB6NeV6FR; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:45:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.6] (unknown [86.45.59.36]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0257153D39; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:45:29 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4EB1ABDF.4030509@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:45:19 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
References: <4E971C36.7050000@cs.tcd.ie> <4EB19DD1.6050904@lodderstedt.net>, <5E3E5DFE-C122-4D89-9578-61A6C16EBD76@ve7jtb.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345263321025@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <F5B0E1D6-2377-4487-8D23-8E55CCABB260@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5B0E1D6-2377-4487-8D23-8E55CCABB260@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:45:32 -0000

So perhaps this is the interesting point of difference.

On 11/02/2011 08:37 PM, John Bradley wrote:
> It is up to the server to decide what formats it will support.

With IETF protocols, its IETF consensus that decides this in
almost all cases that affect interop and it is therefore not
up to the specific server deployment admin what the server
code will support.

I think this case affects interop. and should be treated
as for any other IETF protocol. Am I wrong?

S

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email