Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd comment

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Wed, 04 November 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FE31B3257 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:04:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NAUwiUVzfawa for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B655B1B3252 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:04:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=oV6kwZTn82zN3FYm7LP+gTmKzrDEmpKHzldTV2wpgrg=; b=HLEPcU9c7mPA2Ylu1S0r3NMoUK/OCXx6YgQkM+wD9jrzTiGajBa8ch1CD8Ltg+HNLJEJ+7BQf/iVqD/KtxOJ8xApdcMGjSNuDbcOtWGYFXXY3bgVdbnw1fw857hoOQOZTh+YCs9uzQLiOWRr+9LrCicUg0FOisbxAzlVClOzCWA=
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB441.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.312.18; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:04:11 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0318.003; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:04:11 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd comment
Thread-Index: AdEXFgZ+9CN0zPNjS1iUuZ0RolJO4QAA29mAAAA+4ZA=
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:04:11 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB4423CADD0E9897848961B99F52A0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY2PR03MB442F6667C49F8CF260D504DF52A0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <D2605993.2210B%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2605993.2210B%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [115.125.248.66]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB441; 5:ldZwsW/vTZcf/jvQ383Ql8tU181sB+Eb6xMLgWjITh47P904RmFncQ+6ghT5mH3YetAquZkUrL7H7vc+Kvvg9iLOkyOw1EQvZytAfaPt0GeUa0eEw1BsVemgNBTH9U5pVbnCFzsl6jTJ9a0m+HWLSQ==; 24:czCB2NdukLkOUnSXDwZBweVU3dxiRuW8Q2Y5Zwyufdho6QCmewAm+8iTsR4qw0X2H10HWOSgUYVMnma8iKQZHFBKwPwHgzBkvMZCoipmK0M=; 20:1GzLjjNx2y2kHX8ijb1Sq8SAmu9yCEhG33uRRZTzrmpwQwmRMsuFDqZXwTBaYxRpUyVcMD6h5WX/OYCn8jTmqw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB441;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4415FFFF2CC5FE9F45E8AE9F52A0@BY2PR03MB441.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425024)(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426024)(61427024); SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB441;
x-forefront-prvs: 0750463DC9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(209900001)(71364002)(52604005)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(122556002)(40100003)(5004730100002)(5007970100001)(76576001)(81156007)(230783001)(10290500002)(15975445007)(2950100001)(102836002)(8990500004)(2900100001)(97736004)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(5001770100001)(99286002)(106356001)(2501003)(105586002)(77096005)(74316001)(16297215004)(5002640100001)(19580405001)(87936001)(19625215002)(107886002)(5001960100002)(92566002)(5003600100002)(19617315012)(189998001)(10090500001)(86612001)(11100500001)(33656002)(5008740100001)(86362001)(66066001)(19580395003)(101416001)(54356999)(50986999)(76176999)(16236675004)(6606295002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR03MB4423CADD0E9897848961B99F52A0BY2PR03MB442namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2015 16:04:11.1333 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB441
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/WvU7-_kZsGVx9U5gTYzIpuwadec>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd comment
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:04:18 -0000

Thanks for suggesting the diagrams, Kepeng. They make the document more understandable.

-- Mike
________________________________
From: Kepeng Li<mailto:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
Sent: ‎11/‎5/‎2015 12:57 AM
To: Mike Jones<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd comment

Thank you Mike.

The diagrams look good to me.

Kind Regards
Kepeng

???: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>>
??: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 12:32 am
?: "oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
??: Li Kepeng <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com<mailto:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>>
??: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd comment

Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs draft -06 addresses the remaining document shepherd comment – adding use case diagrams to the introduction.

The updated specification is available at:

·        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06

An HTML formatted version is also available at:

·        https://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06.html

                                                            -- Mike

P.S.  This note was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1471 and as @selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.