Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

I plan to work on that aspect. Do you (or someone else) want to contribute?

regards,
Torsten.

Am 14.09.2010 um 17:18 schrieb Mark Mcgloin <mark.mcgloin@ie.ibm.com>:

> What about Security Considerations. I know some individuals have worked on
> it in the past - does it need a WG to complete
> 
> 
> Mark McGloin
> 
> Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
> Sent by: oauth-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> 
> 12/09/2010 00:59
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
> about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
> discuss WG re-chartering.
> 
> The following items had been proposed at the meeting:
> 
> * Messaging Signing
> Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html
> 
> * User Experience Extensions
> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/
> 
> * Artifact Binding
> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/
> 
> * SAML for OAuth
> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/
> 
> * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
> No draft available (to my knowledge)
> 
> * Dynamic Client Registration
> Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
> 
> I am interested to hear
> a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
> same time.
> b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
> commitment)
> c) what items are you willing to review
> d) whether we should consider other items?
> 
> Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
> Please use the Web tool to upload it:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
> Also use the following filename convention:
> draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth