[OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 14 April 2018 01:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E50C127201 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYyyD4dYPUyJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0962A12422F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 26-v6so365542ois.9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3jGzU/QoILD49OrL6ANPIwSSSVreAst12fjEmF11RRY=; b=OjlNoQ3Zs0KOsdn9dgvwF02zREW5LMyFKJYQgEpPs0vE+EwUUvMrAVhWBbYjDac5+l x0wiRkn+SeTPUHHhf2N+h1C4Qa9lpVs8wjUHLj8TADamDTZfF8hxyjOli9LUODP7DcVt WzMQTWYMdDWZsw305cw7v+3cECRQXzMH01hcc6s+Vt93zhaBkX16x93IFk/Jh1hSnG+t kVeh3KWyXPewnWVy+UE+e7YMQVZFzzf5PjoLjihkUo+yagPHIR7UhAksxttNH2va+cUM x+/+QYdsO2gCiciHzEkoX4HrZuHDotb5OJZ9jhkgeDWycqGekC67HmSIz6iTVLf/Gf7l OIrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3jGzU/QoILD49OrL6ANPIwSSSVreAst12fjEmF11RRY=; b=pnJKr3l/XPlJuK2EGclhQD1JGxE1jCq8tkJ6W+EiTiZMBrJANFKWrotm3bBEYsnVny 8BtXmCmJmQginOFEHqDTKg+IeemrlvvTiCRtJtokzrGQrZEH2oos3VomuA+vt/1KpLgK /HVwa7BV7HolzDySYqjUc4Pa+dl4ZpUtTtz58/51uNNhmHYyb3SxzVdLTsiv1IkuhInH WLpn7qwEjCRdDW9vvY1vXICMfaEKRqQO0cglpUtFJnBykULkXN43+B2fkAgih5EKseCD NGmCeoFbmA1OAPiA+Ec61VaeIRC6cB/Q1/arFmT2nqVxuJ0el9qye9q0TV+W202654o3 N1Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCoU/3EqCeG4124wjd4zAafagBtEopelbP9g0DgHeZHLyP+YcE4 /Q6hBumpMpPutGAnexl2HhkkLAFwXhCKEj7FIcuW9ADh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+0Fst+JPocnLVBxz9KXnSfLiKzf3sAArdqcK3R29o8Sj4lf4nimeDUAMkFevaPwIE3hXfO2AGDqzZJEE70O7E=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c744:: with SMTP id x65-v6mr9295439oif.43.1523667628061; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.138.18.130 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:59:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMWdZ4q8N0X4QrGQhkEVs8_38Tqa8Fou+oVP1tYoJ0aXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba00c00569c483cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/XrppzvXn7vbd1V3-1rmhcbLHzDY>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 01:00:30 -0000
Hi folks, I just looked at the -08 diffs and I see a new section on brute forcing the token but not describing the confused deputy attack. Did I miss something, or were you still planning to add more text? Thanks -Ekr
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-devi… Eric Rescorla
- [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-f… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-devi… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-devi… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-devi… Eric Rescorla