Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420211E809D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLGh2RCTgJ5u for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F0111E809C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p9KLSjEO018504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:28:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p9KLSiTS026458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:28:45 -0500
Received: from [135.244.224.238] (faynberg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.224.238] (may be forged)) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p9KLShCR026274; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:28:44 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4EA0928B.5030601@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:28:43 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oauth@ietf.org
References: <725EAF50-3A82-4AAE-8C60-6D4C4AE52A79@gmx.net> <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E72D8313B2@SN2PRD0302MB137.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <CAC4RtVDQJk5Zxud+yW4yzCLPQAakXQKw5qzi5y0aw1X1U-MVtg@mail.gmail.com> <B33BFB58CCC8BE4998958016839DE27EB414@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG> <DBB4D0DA-06C1-43CC-965C-8B2DD2E554E4@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <DBB4D0DA-06C1-43CC-965C-8B2DD2E554E4@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:28:46 -0000

I agree.

To this end, are we going to have a rechartering discussion?  I would 
very much support that.  We have a number of things waiting, discovery 
being one of them.

Igor

On 10/20/2011 1:18 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> the past that the JSON signature&  encryption work would go into JOES (earlier WOES) and the home for JWT is the OAuth