Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - TMI BFF

Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> Tue, 04 May 2021 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron@parecki.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66393A13AC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parecki.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tuq2KXSzQPtV for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD573A13AB for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id b10so8413358iot.4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parecki.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dP1iohvc9uyb1mRUjkrRzSqsdK6JNM0KgzO6i+N0VRk=; b=YucDkk8sIz7f9KLPHpMAgZQuAW0EjOwM9ifnzjx5okGwJ3RuB3qIuZ78xX8HEPfu7M ceGd1/LwUT04PDMYlosmhRfVZeJ3+wH/I9RQDrFCYacjTl3OB1ez3o7Xyei+Nyu5+JaZ CVIawzSOtsQO6ibznYGxKqtTFXpZkbVaGmDT03g3LO1hvCCKaPNx6ek4JEIw/jKDCEXI eQ7oSUgNpR/Q/7bETzM6d4Tl6aQJKCumYq/CtdWkStey9t/G5T+HOfkL2CBoPEs68Z7g XnCpOmMmLDTeJXCLw8ZxKzmNaXDEUbByBZ8uRlOsZcX6U/XNAcbodL4drXi2sxvfi9mU j2Hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dP1iohvc9uyb1mRUjkrRzSqsdK6JNM0KgzO6i+N0VRk=; b=FieUg8q+/cBzdflnbq3WkYh+xrx6DbPXlP1OvZpgAefu8XhMXeHIUwdkTXuW/WErjH 37H/CDHaUJm2eUVLeSpG+urAQgbdF6W6NOreimdrxR+jC4yfvYA2Xbk21URrPOReL7ZM bJDg+RzlwFL5aM/JxzGcNkUsI0FL4XMmPUl1i+rD+t7qMdLxW2PQYt4x2GCqMfQoL5d8 l1wBi7Gu8R+JGHmm3wGMs9U2NrJZp9War8FxIDXjClGw+iMfxoOJtNTmhC7rn69T8+Wg kvFuPx+uLKakWPeftvq7ZnfqWNMBEsNjjzXQp5Ic68dH3/GNcJ/EXco/wW0oBPiQADea xS4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vaUIV9+ExuO+ns6GKQj67cRvyMFj+ekhyMnb+26YD+MJLhClP FOVb48O0zQb+L3gXfhslRmYJ+B1wZsFI4Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+/i+VIwzYyk9tgWb7Avch7tELgxpLBz8NDvTagjD1SvdAlc3vTR3YPrRKW/HgTpnanh5ElQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2596:: with SMTP id p22mr20812682ioo.101.1620162202904; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com (mail-io1-f41.google.com. [209.85.166.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k13sm1560575iop.24.2021.05.04.14.03.22 for <oauth@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 May 2021 14:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id p8so8407072iol.11 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a04d:: with SMTP id f13mr25943287jah.38.1620162201733; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADNypP9wV6=T-AU+j_hrXT7zH9c8OdKone_0Arq+yPu+aAupNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-uhLf_d0=GpftqoRAZ7_=wEBLBHyUjkR1bomz6xcM_dzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBSGjo=fko9Tc+fbcA3P74xH9bZbg6t6x__-KR7XSfh6A5Evg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-uBK8yhXY1a8nW1Q=62guk_hjJv8WCzzSKrn3MiwWKVqQ@mail.gmail.com> <09226cd8-8880-4906-f745-98780d0d1bef@manicode.com>
In-Reply-To: <09226cd8-8880-4906-f745-98780d0d1bef@manicode.com>
From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:03:10 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAGBSGjrfiK=efSTc6Ho7v1sfa0oa-==Jh7XTYpb_QpC=CVHv4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGBSGjrfiK=efSTc6Ho7v1sfa0oa-==Jh7XTYpb_QpC=CVHv4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Manico <jim@manicode.com>
Cc: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000834d6605c1876896"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/YbjaRe4_ZYR2kDO5zpFltD2zmnk>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - TMI BFF
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:03:30 -0000

Okay, I have come around to this idea and agree that we shouldn't use "BFF"
to refer to this pattern. The only reason I am continuing the discussion in
this thread is that if we agree we should avoid the term BFF for this
draft, I would like to see it renamed before it is adopted, to avoid any
confusion at the start.

Aaron


On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:28 AM Jim Manico <jim@manicode.com> wrote:

> +1 Mr. Hardt. BFF aims to avoid access tokens in UA's so TMI-BFF is a
> badly branded name that will add confusion.
>
> - Jim
> On 5/4/21 11:25 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>
> My concern with BFF is that the common meaning is what the document calls
> Full BFF -- so what many readers will assume is BFF is not what the
> document is referring to.
> ᐧ
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:03 AM Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote:
>
>> I support adoption. I'm also fine with the BFF acronym since it's common
>> in the software development world already. If anything, the TMI acronym is
>> the least strong of the two as it's missing a letter from the full name of
>> the draft.
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:40 AM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm supportive -- but am concerned with the BFF acronym.
>>> ᐧ
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 3:00 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
>>> rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> This is a call for adoption for the *Token Mediating and Session
>>>> Information Backend for Frontend* as a WG document:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bertocci-oauth2-tmi-bff/
>>>>
>>>> Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *May 17th*.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>  Rifaat & Hannes
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Aaron Parecki
>> https://aaronparecki.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> --
> Jim Manico
> Manicode Securityhttps://www.manicode.com
>
>