[OAUTH-WG] Mutual OAuth interim meeting minutes

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 16 January 2018 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4EE12DA6D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pyz66Px_g3fn for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x233.google.com (mail-ua0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A4C12D868 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e19so11394748uam.6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=10SXZAPSA+cjPHitd0LOrXor7WJfGRGxcE9hT0lFAHI=; b=fvQKTYC1xNvFG1t8JGO+zU5rCx4Cedtx2+qOhjXcKbc1m+aWdmDl8V7ip4HxjqRxYn OPeh5Ni3l9eSxfZOUJYn8l+vUCQEodcdQeDgNe7ZJtF5fNMcjVqOkdKJGclUADURK7ub 4gZKrjozxa3ajpEGjiZkgK5wszYlwhHetKhbJRAOBH3s9P2gg7+Ny05onNL5L+O3hdj6 Gapj32rjmxXYUflkAaRkC3JVmlWO+a6O0xsKutgwcLUE7Kx3iXwXW+9LtrdgIoCHfaxJ PRYiARB6Yl42lkXKN1G+fvoUfIk6gp1Dqv8rrFISnItwgwwgiWSIWw3hcYuH9HYEiYn4 FJsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=10SXZAPSA+cjPHitd0LOrXor7WJfGRGxcE9hT0lFAHI=; b=M3sppB7cF6ZTLM5OMb9mtQVZk1+tu9HH27ymlg6p4ACYQ13CGKxnbfbU1rmzs9pMoU ye9vvpX4jgiiEPfkiWLWOjGbTgCLGzqGoev6dj369kmUYA5NvCMXEikUxeqNEflr1pa2 dufrVzqpvx/x0ypY9MIvIw5kS72LQe6OFLLsGlU/gOLvOoUNffOaW7RyVyWXImp2VlCu booat0+Sa0TbGYnvg0XFXAQN0kPJ9fMtoKp7EMOOBo11vw1wdWNh0VC3gN2vwXn7c96K wPvNX0GMlVrk52E54FL1ESrxgR/fK5dX929IE+tify/UQaSLUnb658PzM7zdPpuNFxdE 6eBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdXrC2cJzkLBH9zQ0EB5qKIF6yQxdPw6GWCHMuzRy227YpSIoAn PSiAGTfXIPosCWnZi8HEkqYJ+qZYCGSnswNlRqV/ldSF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBounyVSNH1ybqZWqeITtiRNS5AsWJcOYu/kdr52V6eUZyP1uOTG0KTpRGEgxHchung5eqGYU1byL1cOJpPFG8Y4=
X-Received: by 10.159.54.82 with SMTP id s18mr76266uad.196.1516126962425; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.32.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:22:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:22:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGL6epJYHFWYdGtipcDCbau+gkS3oE5SDdvFuVUZM=-KMgD3hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a11495b7c07d8eb0562e8d1dd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/YhH7TE6PVrsJvFcAyjBMO27JLfM>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Mutual OAuth interim meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:22:46 -0000

*Attendees*:Dick Hardt, Aaron Parecki, Brian Campbell, Dave Tonge, Eve
Maler, John Bradley, Justin Richer, Nat Sakimura, Samuel Erdtman, Tim,
Cappalli, Denis Pinkas, Bjorn Hjelm, Hannes Tschofenig, and Rifaat
Shekh-Yusef.


Dick presented the attached Mutual OAuth slides, which is the same slides
he presented during the IETF meeting in Singapore.

Brian: Token Exchanged was mentioned as a potential alternative solution to
this, but it does not seem to be a proper solution for the use case of this
document.
Justin: the solution make sense to me
Eve: the solution is different from the UMA solution.
Justin: UMA solution is unidirectional, which does not help simplifying the
flow.
Dave: the scope is agreed out of band, which means that the scope is
limited. Also, the second flow should be clarified.
Hannes: are there others that have a similar use case?
Samuel: Spotify has a similar use case with Google Home. The solution has
one approval for both flows
Hannes: for privacy reason it is better to have to approvals.
Brian: the name of the document should be change to avoid any confusion
with the existing mutual oauth document. Suggested names: Reciprocal or
Bilateral.
Brian: grant_type should be a URI
Eve: not clear on the exact flow; will a RS be calling a RS?
John: there are ways to optimize the flow that should be discussed

Hannes poll the group on their support for adopting this document: there
were about 5 or 6 people in favor, 0 against.

The chairs will discuss this with the AD and later continue the adoption
process on the mailing list.

Regards,
 Rifaat