Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue
Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 13:41 UTC
Return-Path: <pelleb@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B863C3A67EA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nunDiHlxlU1p for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853693A67B2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so426425pzk.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oWI5XEMgtlPyTeWzW+gVHCXNoFp3/fTp/Bq9dEzwr/M=; b=atClXsUsFkUjI7pBYZhQUrTva49NBDb235RrlwcmO25XLUFw0LvNRESarxc5NACYEf Sy613YwjTQgzlqWhKeNnb8ot/9NtJ00BbBnlTYefoAZ5rW6EzkHvs4HnLMm7lN8lghb5 CBNB9Y+4sOBBLTbTzrMS+jglrBtkus95txlYE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GarXbmkoFs8JigdRL7lhbrUCd9SUrws+mLRQ1J0uGGHSZho5smSmByrblxr52PtN/2 oADmZISd7vRqpagZfaFtsBeSL1SWwu3xJVxGtT3g3Jbf3zzIehHwMl9vJyANx8Tgk8eG BQ4wLTlYQyXM0JN6mgPqJp2u88gKBckjYwai8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.84.40 with SMTP id m40mr11889541wal.223.1277991593182; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: pelleb@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.58.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilj97ppfsqp6ZzxLJhURLhnmSx9P39-A97OuGAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTilj97ppfsqp6ZzxLJhURLhnmSx9P39-A97OuGAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:39:52 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BzeUaYoL2HgDi_mvqDaY57ZcJLE
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxdunsjF6u2dKyRZhK0DVKDV6VxF8ucg7L4PsU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
To: Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:41:13 -0000
I already implemented 09 but it was a (very tiny) bit of a hassle to have to convert underscores. So I also agree with 3 except headers On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net> wrote: > 3 except headers. > > 2010/7/1 Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>: >> First, sorry about this. J >> >> >> >> I do my best not to ask the group this kind of questions and just pick >> something on my own, but I can’t decide so I’ll run a quick vote (yes, a >> VOTE – I can’t imagine seeking a consensus call on this). >> >> >> >> -09 uses underscores for parameter names (except for in the headers) and >> dashes for parameter values. This seems like an odd selection. Before, it >> used dashes for header parameter names, and underscore everywhere else. Not >> great either. >> >> >> >> So… >> >> >> >> The changes my OCD can live with: >> >> >> >> 1. Use dashes throughout >> >> 2. Use underscores for all parameter names (headers included), dashes for >> all values >> >> 3. Use underscores throughout >> >> >> >> I want to get this done with in a day because people are writing code for >> -09 and I’d like to stop making changes beyond editorial. I just think that >> having different styles between the endpoint parameters and header >> parameters is broken. >> >> >> >> EHL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> > > > > -- > http://lukasrosenstock.net/ > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- http://agree2.com - Reach Agreement! http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking
- [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Michael D Adams
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Lukas Rosenstock
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Pelle Braendgaard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Justin Hart
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue Joseph Smarr
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue William Mills