Return-Path: <pelleb@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id B863C3A67EA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>;
 Thu,  1 Jul 2010 06:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.488
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No,
 score=-0.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11,
 FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nunDiHlxlU1p for
 <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu,  1 Jul 2010 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com
 [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853693A67B2 for
 <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu,  1 Jul 2010 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so426425pzk.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>;
 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
 h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
 :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=oWI5XEMgtlPyTeWzW+gVHCXNoFp3/fTp/Bq9dEzwr/M=;
 b=atClXsUsFkUjI7pBYZhQUrTva49NBDb235RrlwcmO25XLUFw0LvNRESarxc5NACYEf
 Sy613YwjTQgzlqWhKeNnb8ot/9NtJ00BbBnlTYefoAZ5rW6EzkHvs4HnLMm7lN8lghb5
 CBNB9Y+4sOBBLTbTzrMS+jglrBtkus95txlYE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 b=GarXbmkoFs8JigdRL7lhbrUCd9SUrws+mLRQ1J0uGGHSZho5smSmByrblxr52PtN/2
 oADmZISd7vRqpagZfaFtsBeSL1SWwu3xJVxGtT3g3Jbf3zzIehHwMl9vJyANx8Tgk8eG
 BQ4wLTlYQyXM0JN6mgPqJp2u88gKBckjYwai8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.84.40 with SMTP id m40mr11889541wal.223.1277991593182;
 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: pelleb@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.58.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilj97ppfsqp6ZzxLJhURLhnmSx9P39-A97OuGAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
 <AANLkTilj97ppfsqp6ZzxLJhURLhnmSx9P39-A97OuGAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:39:52 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BzeUaYoL2HgDi_mvqDaY57ZcJLE
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxdunsjF6u2dKyRZhK0DVKDV6VxF8ucg7L4PsU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
To: Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "OAuth WG \(oauth@ietf.org\)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
 <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
 <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:41:13 -0000

I already implemented 09 but it was a (very tiny) bit of a hassle to
have to convert underscores.

So I also agree with 3 except headers

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net> w=
rote:
> 3 except headers.
>
> 2010/7/1 Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>:
>> First, sorry about this. J
>>
>>
>>
>> I do my best not to ask the group this kind of questions and just pick
>> something on my own, but I can=E2=80=99t decide so I=E2=80=99ll run a qu=
ick vote (yes, a
>> VOTE =E2=80=93 I can=E2=80=99t imagine seeking a consensus call on this)=
.
>>
>>
>>
>> -09 uses underscores for parameter names (except for in the headers) and
>> dashes for parameter values. This seems like an odd selection. Before, i=
t
>> used dashes for header parameter names, and underscore everywhere else. =
Not
>> great either.
>>
>>
>>
>> So=E2=80=A6
>>
>>
>>
>> The changes my OCD can live with:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Use dashes throughout
>>
>> 2. Use underscores for all parameter names (headers included), dashes fo=
r
>> all values
>>
>> 3. Use underscores throughout
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to get this done with in a day because people are writing code fo=
r
>> -09 and I=E2=80=99d like to stop making changes beyond editorial. =C2=A0=
I just think that
>> having different styles between the endpoint parameters and header
>> parameters is broken.
>>
>>
>>
>> EHL
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://lukasrosenstock.net/
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>



--=20
http://agree2.com - Reach Agreement!
http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking
