Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Sat, 25 September 2010 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3443A6B80 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+xUtfnMW7Fh for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CABE73A6B50 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7686 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2010 02:24:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.21) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 25 Sep 2010 02:24:56 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT003.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.21]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:24:57 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:24:54 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
Thread-Index: ActcR6lr4KTFYTcIQPm3JEk6R5FsiwAES1U3
Message-ID: <C8C2AB86.3AD3A%eran@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <D01C840D-BA0A-42AE-A6C4-C43E6E84C2F2@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C8C2AB863AD3Aeranhueniversecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:24:27 -0000

I'm happy to do that. But I will be breaking the spec into more than two parts. Basically, I will be creating a version that does not force anyone to read anything they might not care about. Clearly, we shouldn't based editorial decisions on what you want to read :-)

EHL


On 9/24/10 5:21 PM, "Dick Hardt" <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

-1 in core

+1 to being referenced in core and being a separate document

On 2010-09-23, at 6:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
>
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth