Archive

Hi Mike,

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018, at 10:11 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> Thanks for the useful review, Alexey.  I propose that we use the same 
> character restrictions that are described in 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7638#section-6, which are:
> 
>    (a) require that member names being registered use
>    only printable ASCII characters excluding double quote ('"') and
>    backslash ('\') (the Unicode characters with code points U+0021,
>    U+0023 through U+005B, and U+005D through U+007E),

This looks reasonable.

> or
> 
>    (b) if new members are defined that use other code
>    points, require that their definitions specify the exact Unicode code
>    point sequences used to represent them.  Furthermore, proposed
>    registrations that use Unicode code points that can only be
>    represented in JSON strings as escaped characters must not be
>    accepted.

So just to double check: it is Ok to register names in Greek or Cyrillic (for example) and they will be compared in a case sensitive manner?

> I also propose that we say that member name comparison occurs in the 
> manner described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159#section-8.3.

My understanding is that RFC 7159 recommends case-sensitive comparison and that is fine with me.

> Will that work for you, Alexey?

Best Regards,
Alexey
> 
> 				Thanks,
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:06 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-discovery@ietf.org; Hannes Tschofenig 
> <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>et>; oauth-chairs@ietf.org; 
> Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: 
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this 
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for the well written IANA Considerations section. I have one 
> comment on it which should be easy to resolve:
> 
> The document doesn't seem to say anything about allowed characters in 
> Metadata names. When the document talks about "case-insensitive 
> matching", it is not clear how to implement the matching, because it is 
> not clear whether or not Metadata names are ASCII only. If they are not, 
> then you need to better define what "case insensitive" means.
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I am agreeing with Adam's DISCUSS.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)