Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?
Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Thu, 15 July 2010 05:50 UTC
Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC823A688F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.598, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7iS-IvIUsyk for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8913D3A69A6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [79.253.14.82] (helo=[192.168.71.41]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1OZHKh-0003xZ-Ti; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:50:08 +0200
References: <4C3E389D.5080300@lodderstedt.net> <AANLkTilbBWMoMj5DIJ7IMYzlBGgZHni7xCYHyAzz_XK4@mail.gmail.com> <95C3FB14-F5C4-4ECB-91EF-9ED988C367DE@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <95C3FB14-F5C4-4ECB-91EF-9ED988C367DE@hueniverse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A293)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <6345F9F9-2EDD-4199-9C90-339CB1757B0A@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8A293)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:49:33 +0200
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Df-Sender: 141509
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:50:56 -0000
Did I get you right? Your answer is: Oauth is not suited for deployments with different resource servers which rely in a single authz server? I don't know why you categorize this as "complex". Is it so unusual to have let's say mail, webstorage, telephony, and payment services? At Deutsche Telekom, we operate such a deployment (with much more different resource servers) and I had hoped to move our token service towards OAuth v2. So would you recommend me zo stick to our proprietary protocol? regards, Torsten. Am 15.07.2010 um 00:39 schrieb Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>: > If your deployment is that complicated, even my discovery proposal is not going to help you... > > EHL > > > > On Jul 14, 2010, at 18:37, "Marius Scurtescu" <mscurtescu@google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt >> <torsten@lodderstedt.net> wrote: >>> I have a question concerning the OAuth philosophy: How many resource servers >>> may be managed by a single OAuth authorization server? (a) A single resource >>> server or (b) several of them exposing different resource types? >>> >>> If the answer is (b) then how is a particular resource server identified in >>> the protocol? Clients have Ids, end-users as well (at least in a future >>> protocol extension), but what about resource server Ids? >>> >>> I think resource servers must be identifiable in multi-server deployments >>> for several reasons: >>> - Interpretation of the scope parameter should be resource server specific - >>> "read" may have different meanings in mail and address book >>> - An authorization server probably wants to apply server-specific security >>> policy, e.g. different access token durations >>> - It will be possible to create special tokens per server >>> >>> I think we should introduce a resource server id in the authz and access >>> token request. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >> >> I think the scope fills this role. Scopes implemented as URIs, for >> example, allow the authz server to map them to resource servers. >> >> Marius >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Ivan Pulleyn
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Ivan Pulleyn
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Wolfgang.Steigerwald
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Andrew Arnott
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed? Eve Maler