IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 11 September 2014 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574441A019B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N06WENPtpceL for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827371A017D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.163] ([167.220.25.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6O1v-1YGl880vKV-00yNHJ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:32:15 +0200
Message-ID: <541222EB.3050300@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:32:11 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
References: <541220B5.2000801@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439AEBCE57@TK5EX14MBXC292.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439AEBCE57@TK5EX14MBXC292.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PhP57Q0hsruC2ENCk0T9Qk4JhVW0SItMq"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CL7z5KiU3FQWNVfxUe5C4nmVe61DEkuRo62CfALFUR/wHnT0Uqy A9iIM8oB5Ehg7nptoNifAUOZ0GNfqLpejxNQzXSbXX/rJqyjHYnw8r5AhJGw4QQPM1RqPCU hpy90TGGnNQzFB34H39nuzXstrh1B8oaDOzpovTc5HBJl0dyCxymmkQDyVUaccxCE+fAxbp RP/nv6cUf7gIJi6Cz+dSA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/_YMjBM3JkkIwEsExTCXQ9ixR3Mk
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:32:21 -0000

Hi Mike,

as I wrote in my mail below, I am looking for feedback whether the IPR
is a concern to companies.

I am not asking for a patent assessment.

Ciao
Hannes

On 09/12/2014 12:26 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> You should not bring this to the working group, other than making people aware that the disclosure exists (which you've already done).  I know that I will leave the room if the contents of a patent are discussed and I will encourage others to likewise do so.
> 
> Engineers should not evaluate patents.  If a person wants a legal opinion on the disclosure, they should privately consult their legal counsel.
> 
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:23 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> in private messages I have gotten questions about this IPR announcement received in March 2014 and the potential implications on the core OAuth
> 2.0 protocol. I was thinking about putting it on the agenda for the next IETF meeting.
> 
> The feedback I am hoping to get is whether there is a concern about this IPR from those who have products and services based on OAuth.
> 
> I want to know whether you see problems or not. If you have problems, maybe there are ways to engineer around it.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> PS: If someone has time to review the state of the art in 2009 I would also like to chat with you.
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:33:05 -0700
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
> To: dick.hardt@gmail.com
> CC: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, derek@ihtfp.com, oauth@ietf.org, ipr-announce@ietf.org
> 
> 
> Dear Dick Hardt:
> 
>  An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework" (RFC6749) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on
> 2014-03-28 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2336/). The title of the IPR disclosure is "Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749."");
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email