Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-oauth-spop-06.txt

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 17 February 2015 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F74E1A88A8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:51:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QHmeqF4aSyW for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:51:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE03F1A88E0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.131.128] ([80.92.119.127]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZU7V-1Y98Dr2az7-00LGFX; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:51:11 +0100
Message-ID: <54E37133.4090401@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:49:55 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
References: <54C7BBA4.4030702@gmx.net> <CA+k3eCQCPiAR0s1cX5mC=h2O-5ptVTVq6=cVKHFKu_Adq8bJTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCQCPiAR0s1cX5mC=h2O-5ptVTVq6=cVKHFKu_Adq8bJTg@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2nbKi8xMJuxFCJbf4M6nUaWk0LuebXhU3"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3IjsWvd3Dv9C9YrYPXJPVj9N7tI0DsGw6w1CxPZPMgTBSEHN1a0 5uz+UCddAz8dGY5f5m+AjnrcG6CqsSwLQsJTKfRPeVuLfJVFoyD+V3FCdq8DdFIKwizqbDM nrCWWkLvfPiJXlBmrsbvJxRcHY4IPZw2mCUy9i7huAZARaRAwbGQQz48xOQAYYvMdO7HOid Z/7xweBjZ127dvUOXjKOw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/_narmphpszeuGtVXOhhGB3fCWZc>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>, "naa@google.com >> Naveen Agarwal" <naa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-oauth-spop-06.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:51:33 -0000

Hi Brian,

what is different between the version you guys implemented and the
version that is currently documented in the latest version of the draft?

Ciao
Hannes


On 01/30/2015 06:50 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
> <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net <mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     1) What implementations of the spec are you aware of?
> 
> 
> We have an AS side implementation of an earlier draft that was released
> in June of last year:
> http://documentation.pingidentity.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26706844