Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (6613)
Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Fri, 25 June 2021 15:39 UTC
Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083E03A1C76 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZ2ud7GmLYZs for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BEC23A1C75 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.49] (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 15PFcxrB006901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:38:59 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20210623000124.GJ11634@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:38:58 -0400
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB5B5DA9-33CC-49FC-BB93-39958955F6F6@mit.edu>
References: <20210617190437.C3E5AF40738@rfc-editor.org> <20210623000124.GJ11634@kduck.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/_ovQVK2-PM-FYrCo_eAT6rhlRXE>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (6613)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:39:08 -0000
I personally agree with this report, the new proposed wording is better. OAuth 2.1 editors, please take note! — Justin > On Jun 22, 2021, at 8:01 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote: > > This looks correct to me; could the authors/WG please confirm? > > Thanks, > > Ben > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:04:37PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, >> "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6613 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Daniel Barclay <danielbarclay.oss@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 3.3 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> The value of the scope parameter is expressed as a list of space-delimited, case-sensitive strings >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> The value of the scope parameter is expressed as a space-delimited list of case-sensitive strings >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The original/current seems to be a bit confusing. >> >> The value is not a collection of space-delimited strings (whatever a "space-delimited string" would be), but it a space-delimited (representation of) a collection of strings. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework >> Publication Date : October 2012 >> Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Web Authorization Protocol >> Area : Security >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (6… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Justin Richer