Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 18:50 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D92621F873C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 049QXMpfD-Cu for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog129.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog129.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AC121F8726 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob129.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+Ns7QUaXG7YvbTYtmCnZUOhPZuHzbvG@postini.com; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:23 PDT
Received: by qcmv28 with SMTP id v28so736826qcm.39 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=i8FCCy26p2gHSZNVpoGBzZ1tMJke1fB7/yWTWORKWdg=; b=V5HIN0YTWnyDv++9okIBgnQM8pD9OeCYiIjNxr0BHosYfRfQusMJWAMTkHvATEq8Wa xxpUpfaeqA0GngWYzmVXoR0Ti0YW9wQkSZfu8y79Q7IN/7BnHqVeqQN3RxPuF/x7t4ng PiuR8ypiFk0uwWACwNzOLcPApjUKeV2uXrLFaWG7jqgViwSfi2KTqZM4fqZCjz6577uM bOwunVpdahESN7y9u4nP8GZ++2RjmPMBkOpDsh1PTRsW6wpFfCw/4WJSq3S3Xqu8JWDb N2kBCFvdvxYf5E9qUnKuKWpquhoJaxFqmbGuRBZ8x7ub3zX2ZB92yJ4U9DGX84JxApWe Aq/Q==
Received: by 10.224.217.67 with SMTP id hl3mr1079537qab.75.1340304620595; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.87.142 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436656323F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436656323F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:49:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCSoipNiSSqwh9egk4P=0itH0bXD1SssNz5jHAGt1TQg=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9GnRXA/Ftw6p7SfRqBy+gfpR+z/Ozvqx5K1TBpy7yoSikjKTUBqa5/olhQZI87WJj2m8v
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:50:24 -0000
I was trying to write something useful for the "Index value" while still staying in-line with the previous revisions of doc as well as the URNs that we've used in the SAML and JWT profiles. But I agree that there's no need to unnecessarily restrict it to a two level structure. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: > This draft is much clearer. Thanks for the quick turn-around. > > One question: You added: > *Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<class>:<id> with <class>:<id> as the index value > Why bake the assumption of a two-level structure into the registry? > > For instance, you could easily imagine legal and useful registrations of the form <class>:<subclass>:<id>, etc. > > Maybe change this to say: > *Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> with <value> as the index value. It is suggested that <value> include both a "class" and an "identifier-within-class" component, with the two components being separated by a colon (":"); other compositions of the <value> may also be used. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:53 AM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth > Author(s) : Brian Campbell > Hannes Tschofenig > Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt > Pages : 7 > Date : 2012-06-21 > > Abstract: > This document establishes an IETF URN Sub-namespace for use with > OAuth related specifications. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03 > > A diff from previous version is available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
- [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-n… internet-drafts
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig