Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery

I think the service discovery document (describing all the endpoints and 
features of the AS) is a valid starting point. That's basically how we 
use the OIDC discovery in the OAuth context today at DT. We refer 
partners to the openid-configuration document. Putting the data relevant 
to OAuth under .well_known/oauth would be more reasonable from a OAuth 
developer's perspective (in my opinion).

We still have to learn, how clients really discover the location of this 
discovery document. We can come up with extensions for user id/resource 
service data based discovery at any time, if we

kind regards,
Torsten.

Am 05.02.2016 um 01:34 schrieb Justin Richer:
> +1, if we define a webfinger/rel at all.
>
> I would rather we just define the service discovery document, the thing that lives under .well-known.
>
>   — Justin
>
>
>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Roland Hedberg <roland.hedberg@umu.se> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> 4 feb 2016 kl. 08:10 skrev Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>:
>>>
>>> +1 for adoption.
>>>
>>> However I would like a rel value distinct from OpenID (see separate email). While the mechanics of discovery is the same, I believe some clients will want to distinguish between OAuth AS’s and OIDC OPs.  Further, I would expect over time that different discovery features may be required. Locking them together seems like a pre-mature or rush choice.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> @independentid
>>> www.independentid.com
>>> phil.hunt@oracle.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:44 PM, William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for adoption of this document by the working group
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> I support adoption of this document by the working group.  I'll note that elements of this specification are already in production use by multiple parties.
>>>>
>>>>                                 -- Mike
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:49 AM
>>>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Discovery, see
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-discovery-00
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group.
>>>>
>>>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.
>>>>
>>>> The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 19 for / zero against / 4 persons need more information.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao
>>>> Hannes & Derek
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth