Re: [OAUTH-WG] Next steps on the OAuth Assertion Drafts

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 19 September 2013 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97121F9767 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPb0fS1f-13d for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7239C21F994A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.255.130.67] ([194.251.119.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMYZG-1VGcOV0n1S-008NFu for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <523B13BE.7020007@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:09:50 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
References: <1373E8CE237FCC43BCA36C6558612D2AA33964@USCHMBX001.nsn-intra.net> <CA+k3eCTGK3iyboVbVWFYcNUMVcKTHJCXoOvY6UoHyjD8JLb8FQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394371FEB121@TK5EX14MBXC290.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394371FEB121@TK5EX14MBXC290.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wNWj0WYQ+AotbFBWpd0mCIwyd1e8bafDaVqpsfW4rhxBgZHbB1A TbmysXO1jL9M+aWavE2qY+4ayPi9HiUIacMWwcyMpea52R5QdUQANWUEnJToMPn1rdju8IG Y5/tNJJ1zRyqWEphakRa5vvJ3aEum+Xx1nhzm9zrsISEaSnG2ZI1A+xmnu00LoBmmegIJLb 7U5wRe5SE1gQqmM41RAEA==
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Next steps on the OAuth Assertion Drafts
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:10:09 -0000

On 19.09.2013 17:48, Mike Jones wrote:
> I also think that the text is already there and these specs are ready
> to progress as-is.  If anyone disagrees, please let us know what text
> needs to be changed or added.

I dropped Barry a mail and I will have to carefully re-read the 
documents myself in preparation for the shepherd writeup.

Ciao
Hannes