Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Sat, 25 September 2010 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A903A6B1F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0+J-BSN4gkz for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C866C3A6AA5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so1026221pvg.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=/lb3egATo3tqSDU8TyVYTM23OCbci4Hnd6viUMv1Pl4=; b=pndFlxXqfkgi8ArwEXM0wDo6WoKO2qi4c9QHquFB9n1FGk2frciyxVoHrKknFfuWDD FiZAzQAiXTQhWftYR508b0qPUFXiIW1OydponWwCRyehOQNzLt3vAVZv/PvZN+/H/0XC ImzYHsGo5wF6ggTNotkpthgpgUClqPRZSzDE8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=llvzP9zVzUTQ156EUk5nCA40b9m02E8gbNlZQ+/J6sryBnK6xDWFqM93Uviab07aWA VfUGKyaGZPbhmje5e3sb7ZXQLm0fXzFwdfKvDDNCch0UPbkkFFfCLKaWqy91aaMPRtq6 5VX3HvirIThl8O31TBSQD2JUzRB+P3DInzigM=
Received: by 10.114.13.2 with SMTP id 2mr4465173wam.155.1285374114742; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([24.130.32.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s5sm4499018wak.12.2010.09.24.17.21.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:44 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D01C840D-BA0A-42AE-A6C4-C43E6E84C2F2@gmail.com>
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:21:22 -0000

-1 in core

+1 to being referenced in core and being a separate document

On 2010-09-23, at 6:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
> 
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
> 
> EHL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth