Re: [OAUTH-WG] native app support (was: Next draft)

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Wed, 09 June 2010 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B611D3A699E for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.952, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXnRxp9P-Yim for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA0A3A6992 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p4fff1dc2.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.255.29.194] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1OMOav-0001Oe-DS; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:57:37 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0FC800.5040404@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:57:36 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
References: <AANLkTikkG3T_DYKhjMbyYayi7SzZel3RJXFSguxq7SSZ@mail.gmail.com> <4C0F45EC.4050707@lodderstedt.net> <AANLkTinxNHQLPmdHyljzAjciUo5Mi5YIe9TntEwQoTml@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinxNHQLPmdHyljzAjciUo5Mi5YIe9TntEwQoTml@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Sender: 141509
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] native app support (was: Next draft)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:57:38 -0000

Oops, I misread this point.

So +1 for 3), too.

regards,
Torsten.

Am 09.06.2010 18:45, schrieb Marius Scurtescu:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt
> <torsten@lodderstedt.net>  wrote:
>    
>> 3) I would rather add the user_code as optional URL parameter to the device
>> flow.
>>      
> Are you suggesting the same thing? That the endpoint at
> verification_uri should accept an optional user_code query parameter?
>
> Marius
>