IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECFE1A8AC0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTqV9TPMauAR for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com (mail-qg0-f47.google.com [209.85.192.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC6201A9060 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so72070908qge.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=/R+4cf94kJJe40OwRwNFiB4sR6Rb+MRuu6JUn2JG91I=; b=c//X9K8kbalgM1XogS+f1XEPhhmW+S812V8gnFtEIueIHj8N1ugJT8Y25PN7P4LLTy ibCYCLowwf7TFevvJOFlNsx0d4kRWo0I4XLR4cRcVn6cmxmbA+TbmjGVgaJ3f/215/lZ ReJ3998q6p+ZM5n3pJQ1xH8sIZsH7QdZv27N3KcJzXVQOlNJh5mnBB4t7nfXnxZwHIrB WLNNUCnNbJm/D0m9QRq44D/9EJR3silcbhlsQakBalHZcSYF0q/ToErmlpwu09Uz5MzY wULdkCEvOehkRzmEbN8wicaDdpdMoyHy1ALvXDajL8t7/z2SJ5sM/89pcfyNdNUWmY9D MObg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsW5SbuOLgi6CpnajWcs7FAEI/f9vcAFdKRg02NXLWcu/yAk1QsrBx09ARTss3Si6cLYFc
X-Received: by 10.140.233.213 with SMTP id e204mr17298856qhc.43.1444405160735; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.101] ([181.202.138.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 206sm851804qhq.39.2015.10.09.08.39.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7D11C4E3-4EEB-407D-9675-3D63025ECBB4"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2AN-Q=kEXh+ky4GDLWGr6HHsu1P_1KLxg2FX_VuCCMhTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:39:15 -0300
Message-Id: <C06D3E39-5977-43A3-86BC-3939F1F104C0@ve7jtb.com>
References: <00c001d10233$debc8720$9c359560$@nri.co.jp> <8BA8D241-67FF-4DD2-AA01-DF007D8916B0@manicode.com> <CABzCy2AN-Q=kEXh+ky4GDLWGr6HHsu1P_1KLxg2FX_VuCCMhTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/e4GmzS6qXCAiiG1sE7n6YJdIvk4>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:39:24 -0000

We could switch the order to say “JWT request to the Authorization Endpoint”, but that is a bit long.

John B.


> On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> The reason for saying authorization request is that there are two types of requests in RFC6749; authorization request and token request. This draft deals with the former and thus named JAR.  
> 
> Nat
> 
> 2015年10月9日金曜日、Jim Manico<jim@manicode.com <mailto:jim@manicode.com>>さんは書きました:
> The word authorization is implied by OAuth, consider "OAuth 2.0 JWT Request".
> 
> --
> Jim Manico
> @Manicode
> (808) 652-3805
> 
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:43 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakimura@nri.co.jp');>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi OAuthers:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> One of the to do for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05> is to come up with a better title.
>> 
>> The current title “OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)”, is somewhat better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better name, I am all for it.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have an idea.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakimura@nri.co.jp');>>
>> 
>> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> PLEASE READ:
>> 
>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
>> 
>> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OAuth@ietf.org');>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ <http://www.sakimura.org/en/>
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en <http://twitter.com/_nat_en>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email