Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion
Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 01:34 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD8521E803E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:34:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqrQrjtiPfPt for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C7E321E800E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 7832 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2012 01:34:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.21) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2012 01:34:26 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT003.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.21]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:34:23 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:34:21 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion
Thread-Index: AczsSxyPoOSUy5oeS6W6LPx7XXN+AA==
Message-ID: <7D27AB20-5F74-4979-9286-93789A493DAD@hueniverse.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723453AADDDA68@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <CAC4RtVAq2bubhhd3i56QKfwq+=h-9Ra-8-F=taYMHy5Sp9jy-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAq2bubhhd3i56QKfwq+=h-9Ra-8-F=taYMHy5Sp9jy-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:34:28 -0000
Purely editorial. EH On Feb 15, 2012, at 15:09, "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Do you have changes to make based on the Apps and TSV Directorate reviews? > > Barry
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Eran Hammer