Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

[John Bradley <[e-mail]>]

Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.

I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.

Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating.

I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.

John B.

On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:

> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our use cases and requirements
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig; [e-mail] WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
> 
> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents.
> 
> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
> 
> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
> 
> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
> 
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
> To: [e-mail] WG
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. 
> 
> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear 
> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and 
> * whether you want to present something. 
> 
> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
> 
> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the face-to-face meeting. 
> 
> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth