Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0901A9124 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:27:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmZOXEIJweNz for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877F11A910B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:27:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=J4oliRfXuiBFfhsfDFurTF5d4tozI35b/LMKZo3sSQ4=; b=gn9GHYqpHdYwv0QnZcpSBxhYR+Ik8D1FZeD2dpJaNj78ZD+sqEepmsw7pguFYTgfh0DUCnvqwTuD+byEZ8bkGmgXFq9etR0avgJ/LpZMNuVECGWQ8dvBIoUoVGeF6NgpWlljKlXZMbtCfSmDgjO66Ji3c8X7AZDIZtHxSkNFZLk=
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.396.15; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 06:27:04 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0396.020; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 06:27:04 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery
Thread-Index: AQHRUq9fdKCTVExz1EmLmbudzdHxT58bhJLw
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:27:04 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB44237A6E59B1E76D9B7D14CF5D10@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <569E2298.3010508@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <569E2298.3010508@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmx.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.47.85.157]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2ae40463-4cc9-4b6a-6a9c-08d32d2c32ff
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB443; 5:E2EOhSshcPkc6LrXf/zHZBy4U3UMovOBgrxYRbgi9EkE6rXpni3KLJrPl6fDQsywt/Bu9K6w/+Qv4nMebIk+hu7XH770qAJwc3FM1wOd9zTTbwfSJEQ51MlQJ0Sr/txId7STMBzUVQlH/EQjuKGGWQ==; 24:GbtzGT88iKGRDqXGtcxqcWvQflfYUwQmB7pJbp7cv7QoFfocJkrov2jns1rHRQ2fQ0tFBYWSMoka7XYQ9jyqR/0QlzVIxm7Ew5g05TsM2xo=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4435AC7710D299F31320CA3F5D10@BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-forefront-prvs: 084285FC5C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(13464003)(53754006)(10090500001)(19580395003)(5001770100001)(2501003)(5003600100002)(40100003)(66066001)(19580405001)(74316001)(99286002)(33656002)(5004730100002)(5002640100001)(76576001)(106116001)(86612001)(50986999)(586003)(92566002)(2900100001)(3660700001)(11100500001)(76176999)(77096005)(15975445007)(87936001)(5008740100001)(2906002)(1096002)(5005710100001)(107886002)(189998001)(1220700001)(10290500002)(3280700002)(2950100001)(3846002)(86362001)(122556002)(6116002)(102836003)(10400500002)(54356999)(5001960100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Feb 2016 06:27:04.4438 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB443
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/fErIitht7RQP9ak_dtKPtwSZP90>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:27:07 -0000

I support adoption of this document by the working group.  I'll note that elements of this specification are already in production use by multiple parties.

				-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:49 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery

Hi all,

this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Discovery, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-discovery-00

Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group.

Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.

The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 19 for / zero against / 4 persons need more information.

Ciao
Hannes & Derek