Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Sun, 04 September 2011 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FA221F8AC9 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUld6xEmRG-1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7004021F8ABC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13321 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2011 23:22:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.46) by p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 4 Sep 2011 23:22:32 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT004.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.134]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:22:32 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:20:41 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
Thread-Index: AcxmI+ANYBPleroZQyGfb2fKoQ9XYAFNV9Jg
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234518A4F23D7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <1765F65A-9FFF-47AC-89D0-EC29E2918EE9@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <1765F65A-9FFF-47AC-89D0-EC29E2918EE9@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:20:50 -0000

Where is this feedback?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 1:16 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
> 
> Hi Eran,
> 
> I gave presentations to the security area directorate, and have asked for
> review comments. Some of the folks (such as Tom Yu, and Shawn Emery)
> showed up in the meetings and the side meetings and provided comments.
> As Barry said, there will be more review comments flying in after the
> document left the working group.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> PS: I had also given presentations at the SAAG meeting to solicit more
> feedback.
> 
> On Aug 6, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> 
> > Did the chairs issue a last call request to anyone in the security area? I
> thought the whole point of moving this working group from apps to security
> was to increase the review and participation of that area. So far I have seen
> absolutely nothing to indicate any such contribution. I would like to know
> what actual actions are being taken to turn this promise into reality.
> >
> > EHL
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth