Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-01 and Open Issues

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985A71A0318 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:00:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL=0.141, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQqWeNYSYcOK for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout-xforward.gmx.net (mout-xforward.gmx.net [82.165.159.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337601A01A9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.131.142] ([80.92.121.102]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mbxdm-1YDUPQ2oIo-00JJtG; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:00:46 +0100
Message-ID: <54F8537D.5010309@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:00:45 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
References: <54F81ADA.3000203@gmx.net> <0B09DB9C-CB26-448D-AE4B-F50E37C2560A@ve7jtb.com> <54F83F32.3040305@gmx.net> <FE8540FB-5CF6-4B1F-9C07-21638865AB17@ve7jtb.com> <54F84F69.2090408@gmx.net> <A49503FE-3634-4859-9180-B7589259515D@ve7jtb.com> <54F8532F.7000501@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <54F8532F.7000501@mit.edu>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SGSQQ2AqeqIf3kAW34mwuJxE7Gi4L7pO2"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TV1ZSVg1XwB4Gs+wtVMQTvBnSwyaBA9M9r0lTA2tdzhQ8ImgdK1 iMCyfw3/GsTftpMd3rhLj58mje6yriYdVz4aDJrLkF/WNfMdWB2GEp+HF4HoKPYgBd8qkKl VclKBXmj8tfUOotSGb63eMows9QZc6v+Z3D61zOvBbszVAkDeII99PojBkHf/iM9rIfCwCV J8Nm4GtDYOKgL7xgdQQ0w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: junk:10;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/gKckDmsWTAzeTDe0Wxl3HCTGzc8>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-01 and Open Issues
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:00:51 -0000

I agree and this can be done in AUTH48.

On 03/05/2015 01:59 PM, Justin Richer wrote:
> Right, but do we need to say that in Dyn-Reg? That's really more of a
> problem for the protocol using the keys, not the one registering it for
> use.