Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 18:14 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E275321F877E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.824
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XMUP35khtFIz for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8121F875A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail140-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.251) by CH1EHSOBE013.bigfish.com (10.43.70.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:13:07 +0000
Received: from mail140-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail140-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAF980384; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:13:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -28
X-BigFish: VS-28(zz9371I936eI542M1447Izz1202hzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail140-ch1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail140-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail140-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1340302384990439_10242; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.232]) by mail140-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F2D400062; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by CH1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (10.43.70.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:13:04 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.53]) by TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.154]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:14:18 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNT9bbR+7wOx82f0K640qXd1uXTpcFEcsQ
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:14:16 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436656323F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:14:43 -0000
This draft is much clearer. Thanks for the quick turn-around. One question: You added: *Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<class>:<id> with <class>:<id> as the index value Why bake the assumption of a two-level structure into the registry? For instance, you could easily imagine legal and useful registrations of the form <class>:<subclass>:<id>, etc. Maybe change this to say: *Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> with <value> as the index value. It is suggested that <value> include both a "class" and an "identifier-within-class" component, with the two components being separated by a colon (":"); other compositions of the <value> may also be used. -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:53 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth Author(s) : Brian Campbell Hannes Tschofenig Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2012-06-21 Abstract: This document establishes an IETF URN Sub-namespace for use with OAuth related specifications. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03 A diff from previous version is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-n… internet-drafts
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig